| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff.
AIMS: To audit the information content of pathology reports of colorectal cancer specimens in one National Health Service region. METHODS: All reports of colorectal cancer resection specimens from the 17 NHS histopathology laboratories in Wales during 1993 were evaluated against: (a) standards previously agreed as desirable by pathologists in Wales; and (b) standards considered to be the minimum required for informed patient management. RESULTS: 1242 reports were audited. There was notable variation in the performance of different laboratories and in the completeness of reporting of individual items of information. While many items were generally well reported, only 51.5% (640/ 1242) of rectal cancer reports contained a statement on the completeness of excision at the circumferential resection margin and only 30% (373/1242) of all reports stated the number of involved lymph nodes. All of the previously agreed items were contained in only 11.3% (140/1242) of reports on colonic tumours and 4.0% (40/1242) of reports on rectal tumours. Seventy eight per cent (969/1242) of colonic carcinoma reports and 46.6% (579/ 1242) of rectal carcinoma reports met the minimum standards. CONCLUSIONS: The informational content of many routine pathology reports on colorectal cancer resection specimens is inadequate for quality patient management, for ensuring a clinically effective cancer service through audit, and for cancer registration. Template proforma reporting using nationally agreed standards is recommended as a remedy for this, along with improved education, review of laboratory practices in the light of current knowledge, and further motivation of pathologists through their involvement in multidisciplinary cancer management teams.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. J A Morris, N. J Maughan, D. Forman, and P. Quirke Who to treat with adjuvant therapy in Dukes B/stage II colorectal cancer? The need for high quality pathology Gut, October 1, 2007; 56(10): 1419 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. A. Morris, N. J. Maughan, D. Forman, and P. Quirke Identifying Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients: The Influence of the Patient, Surgeon, and Pathologist J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2007; 25(18): 2573 - 2579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 MERCURY Study Group Extramural Depth of Tumor Invasion at Thin-Section MR in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Results of the MERCURY Study Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P M King, J M Blazeby, J Gupta, D Alderson, and M Moorghen Upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit to compare standards with minimum datasets J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 57(7): 702 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D F H Pheby, D F Levine, R W Pitcher, and N A Shepherd Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2004; 57(1): 43 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F.C. Wright, C.H. L. Law, L. Last, M. Khalifa, A. Arnaout, Z. Naseer, N. Klar, S. Gallinger, and A.J. Smith Lymph Node Retrieval and Assessment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 903 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Fiocca and P Ceppa Endoscopic biopsies J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2003; 56(5): 321 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y Niv Pathologists and gastroenterologists J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2003; 56(4): 241 - 242. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Wilson and R Feakins The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2002; 55(9): 719 - 719. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S H Burroughs and G T Williams Examination of large intestine resection specimens J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2000; 53(5): 344 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. D. Nagtegaal, E. K. Kranenbarg, J. Hermans, C. J. H. van de Velde, and J. H. J. M. van Krieken Pathology Data in the Central Databases of Multicenter Randomized Trials Need to Be Based on Pathology Reports and Controlled by Trained Quality Managers J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2000; 18(8): 1771 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| Journal of Clinical Pathology | Molecular Pathology |
