Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2000;53:537-540; doi:10.1136/jcp.53.7.537
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
J Clin Pathol 2000; 53:537-540
© 2000 Journal of Clinical Pathology

Preoperative histological classification of primary lung cancer: accuracy of diagnosis and use of the non-small cell category

S L Edwards1, C Roberts1, M E McKean1, J S Cockburn2, R R Jeffrey2, K M Kerr1

1 Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and University Medical School, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK
2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and University Medical School

Correspondence to:
Dr Kerr email: k.kerr{at}abdn.ac.uk Accepted for publication 29 November 1999

Aims—To compare the preoperative classification of lung carcinoma made on cytological and histological specimens with the postoperative classification made on the resected specimen. In addition, to find out how often the term "non-small cell lung cancer, not otherwise specified" (NSCLC) was used, and in such cases to note the final diagnosis.

Methods—Between 1991 and 1995, 303 patients had a lung resection in Aberdeen for primary carcinoma. For each patient, the departmental records were examined for preoperative specimens (cytological and histological). A note was made of whether each specimen was positive or negative for malignancy and, if positive, what the cell type was. Where patients had more than one sample submitted, the most specific result was taken.

Results—Fifty four per cent of patients had a correct specific preoperative diagnosis of malignancy, whereas 34% were labelled as NSCLC. Patients with squamous carcinoma were more likely to have a diagnosis of malignancy (88%) that was specifically correct (75%). Patients who had adenocarcinoma were less likely to have a preoperative diagnosis of malignancy (64%) that was specifically correct (35%). For those in whom a diagnosis of NSCLC was made, 55% turned out to have adenocarcinoma whereas 24% had squamous carcinoma.

Conclusions—By adhering strictly to criteria, a high accuracy of diagnosis can be achieved for squamous carcinoma, but the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma seems to be more of a challenge. NSCLC is a useful and appropriate classification, the use of which reduces the rate of inaccurate specific diagnosis. There are occasions when pathologists can provide a more accurate diagnosis by being less precise.

Key Words: lung cancer • accuracy of classification • non-small cell


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rossi, G., Pelosi, G., Graziano, P., Barbareschi, M., Papotti, M. (2009). Review Article: A Reevaluation of the Clinical Significance of Histological Subtyping of Non--Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: Diagnostic Algorithms in the Era of Personalized Treatments. INT J SURG PATHOL 17: 206-218 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs