ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas

G Cserni

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Cserni, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, H-6000 Kecskemét, Nyíri út 38., POB 149, Hungary;
cserni{at}freemail.hu

Aims: The reliable identification of node negative colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) has often been linked to the histological examination of a minimum number of lymph nodes. The sizes of the lymph nodes, their metastatic status, and their number were investigated to establish whether these parameters are related, and whether their relation could help in determining the adequacy of staging.

Methods: One thousand three hundred and thirty four negative lymph nodes, 189 metastatic lymph nodes, and 43 pericolonic/perirectal tumour deposits measuring 3 mm from 60 node positive and from 63 node negative patients with CRC were assessed for size.

Results: The mean size (SD) of these structures was 4.5 (2.7) mm. The lymph nodes were significantly larger in the CRCs with metastatic nodes (4.7 v 4.3 mm). Involved nodes were significantly larger than negative nodes (6.3 v 4.2 mm), despite the fact that the largest node was 5 mm in one third of node positive CRCs. The examination of the seven largest nodes could have adequately staged 97% of node positive CRCs and 98% of all CRCs.

Conclusions: The nodal staging of CRCs is dependent not only on the number of lymph nodes investigated, but also on qualitative features of the lymph nodes assessed, including their size. Lymph nodes are not equivalent and any study neglecting this fact will give grounds for error in the recommendation of a minimum number of nodes for the reliable determination of node negative CRCs. Although pathologists should aim to recover all nodes, a negative nodal status based on only seven nodes can be reliable.

Keywords: colorectal carcinoma; nodal staging; lymph node retrieval

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal carcinoma; HE, haematoxylin and eosin; NN, negative node; PN, positive node: TDN, perirectal or pericolic tumour-deposits 3 mm with no evidence of residual nodal elements

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Cserni, G (2003). Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes. J. Clin. Pathol. 56: 327-335 [Abstract] [Full Text]