Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;55:495-498
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;55:495-498
© 2002 Journal of Clinical Pathology

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Total research productivity in a pathology discipline

A S Wierzbicki1, T M Reynolds2

1 St Thomas's Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK
2 Queen's Hospital, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire DE13 0RB, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A S Wierzbicki, Department of Chemical Pathology, St Thomas's Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK;
Anthony.Wierzbicki{at}kcl.ac.uk

Aims: To investigate the research productivity of all staff in chemical pathology.

Methods: Chemical pathologists or biochemical scientists were identified from publicly available sources. All journals, their impact factors (IFs), and individual publications over the period of 1995 to 1999 were identified from electronic databases. Each publication was subclassified with respect to type of publication, number and position of author, and subspecialty to which the article referred.

Results: Research output over the period comprised 6162 articles, originating from 1399 individuals, 264 of whom were medically qualified. Specialty initiated research accounted for 26% of the total publications and 80% of the research was performed in teaching hospitals. Research output was highly skewed because 49% of individuals published a letter or more, 20% published one original piece of research over five years, but only 4% were research active, as defined by one publication each year. International standard research, defined as one paper each year in journals with IF > 4, was achieved by 1% of the profession, mostly aged > 55 years. Skewed distributions of publication rates were found in all age deciles. The possession of higher research degrees correlated with higher output in all age deciles.

Conclusions: Those working in chemical pathology are active in initiating and conducting research, although at a low level. Because longterm activity in research correlates with the possession of higher research degrees and the opportunity to carry out research from early in career pathways, priority should be given to encouraging research in training, given the small and ageing profile of international quality research in the profession in the UK.

Keywords: research assessment; pathology; chemical pathology; clinical biochemistry; physician; scientist

Abbreviations: IF, impact factor; IFP, impact factor point; NHS, National Health Service; RAE, research assessment exercise; SCI, Science Citation Index


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Fritzsche, F R, Oelrich, B, Dietel, M, Jung, K, Kristiansen, G (2008). European and US publications in the 50 highest ranking pathology journals from 2000 to 2006. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 474-481 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reynolds, T M, Wierzbicki, A S (2004). Does activity in research correlate with visibility?. J. Clin. Pathol. 57: 426-427 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs