Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;55:581-586; doi:10.1136/jcp.55.8.581
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;55:581-586
© 2002 Journal of Clinical Pathology

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of margins of excision on recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

A G Douglas-Jones1, J Logan1, J M Morgan1, R Johnson1, R Williams2

1 Departments of Pathology and Surgery, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF14 4XW, UK
2 Breast Test Wales, 18 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF1 9LJ, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A G Douglas-Jones, Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF14 4XW, UK;
douglas-jones{at}cf.ac.uk

Aims: To determine important factors influencing recurrence after local excision of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Materials and methods: The extent (size) in millimetres, classification (by cytonuclear grade (NHSBSP system), by extent of necrosis, and by the Van Nuys system), and excision margins of 115 cases of screen detected DCIS treated by local excision were measured. A prognostic index was calculated by the addition of the Van Nuys classification (low grade, 1; moderate grade, 2; high grade, 3), margin score (>= 10 mm, 1; 1–9 mm, 2; < 1 mm, 3), and size score (<= 15 mm, 1; 16–40 mm, 2; and >= 41 mm, 3), giving a total score of 3–9.

Results: Classification using cytonuclear grade, extent of necrosis, or the Van Nuys system did not correlate significantly with recurrence. The excision margin (in millimetres) was associated with recurrence (p = 0.027) and if excision margin status was simplified using the scoring system (>= 10 mm, 1; 1–9 mm, 2; < 1 mm, 3), the margin score was significantly associated with recurrence (p = 0.03). A prognostic index based on the Van Nuys score, margin status, and size was significantly associated with recurrence (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: The results support the hypothesis that the margin of excision is the most important factor predicting the recurrence of DCIS after local excision.

Keywords: duct carcinoma of breast; duct carcinoma in situ; breast

Abbreviations: DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; WLE, wide local excision


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Brown, A. P., Ellison, M. C., Kenney, P. J., Kettritz, U., Anderson, W. F., Chu, K. C., Burstein, H. J., Wong, J. S., Kaelin, C. M. (2004). Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast. NEJM 351: 399-402 [Full Text]  
  • Leonard, G. D., Swain, S. M. (2004). Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Complexities and Challenges. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 906-920 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs