Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:43-47; doi:10.1136/jcp.56.1.43
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:43-47
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Corridor consultations and the medical microbiological record: is patient safety at risk?

S R Heard1, C Roberts2, S J Furrows1, M Kelsey3, L Southgate4 on behalf of the Specialty Assessment Working Group for Medical Microbiology of the GMC

1 London Deanery, 20 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1DZ, UK
2 Level 6, Medical Microbiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
3 Department of Microbiology, Whittington Hospital, Highgate, London N19 5NF, UK
4 Performance Assessment Implementation Group, General Medical Council, Great Portland St, London W1N 6JE, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Heard, London Deanery, 20 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1DZ, UK;
sheard{at}londondeanery.ac.uk

The performance procedures of the General Medical Council are aimed at identifying seriously deficient performance in a doctor. The performance procedures require the medical record to be of a standard that enables the next doctor seeing the patient to give adequate care based on the available information. Setting standards for microbiological record keeping has proved difficult. Over one fifth of practising medical microbiologists (including virologists) in the UK (139 of 676) responded to a survey undertaken by the working group developing the performance procedures for microbiology, to identify current practice and to develop recommendations for agreement within the profession about the standards of the microbiological record. The cumulative frequency for the surveyed recording methods used indicated that at various times 65% (90 of 139) of respondents used a daybook, 62% (86 of 139) used the back of the clinical request card, 57% (79 of 139) used a computer record, and 22% (30 of 139) used an index card system to record microbiological advice, suggesting wide variability in relation to how medical microbiologists maintain clinical records.

Keywords: General Medical Council; performance procedures; clinical risk; corridor consultations; medical microbiological record; patient safety

Abbreviations: GMC, General Medical Council; SAWG, Specialty Assessment Working Group


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Riordan, T., Cartwright, K., Cunningham, R., Logan, M., Wright, P. (2007). A survey of time management and particular tasks undertaken by consultant microbiologists in the UK. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 540-544 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Greig, J R (2003). Accuracy and completeness of the documentation of blood culture results. J. Clin. Pathol. 56: 558-558 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs