© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Association of Clinical Pathologists
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens
1 Digital Microscopy Laboratory, Second Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi St. 46, 1088 Budapest, Hungary
2 First Department of Pathology and Experimental Oncology, Semmelweis University
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Molnar, II Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi St. 46, 1088 Budapest, Hungary;
mb{at}bel2.sote.hu
Aims: To evaluate a recently developed digital slide and virtual microscope system, and to compare this method with optical microscopy on routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens in both local and remote access modes.
Methods: A fully computer controlled commercial microscope was used. The scanning program included object detection, autofocus, and image compression algorithms. The overall hard disk space for a gastric biopsy was between 30 and 50 MB and the scanning time was between 20 and 40 minutes. Haematoxylin and eosin stained routine gastric (61) and colon (42) biopsy specimens were selected, scanned, and evaluated by two specialists on an optical (OM) and virtual microscope (VM).
Results: The overall concordance of VM and OM with the consensus diagnosis was 95.1% and 97%, respectively. Clinically important concordance was 96.1% and 98% for VM and OM, respectively. The two methods showed concordance in 92% of cases and clinically important concordance in 94.1% of cases. The reasons for discordance were image quality (one case), interpretation difference (three cases), and insufficient clinical information (three cases). Remote evaluation of the digital slides through the Internet has the advantages of the previously used static and dynamic telepathology methods.
Conclusions: Diagnostic concordance was found between OM and VM. The digital slide and the virtual microscope can be alternative techniques in the computerisation of the histology laboratory and in teleconsultation services after further evaluation of time and storage constraints.
Keywords: digital slide; digital microscope; gastric biopsy; section
Abbreviations: OM, optical microscopy; VM, virtual microscopy
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ying, X., Monticello, T. M.
(2006). Modern Imaging Technologies in Toxicologic Pathology: An Overview. Toxicol Pathol
34: 815-826
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Dee, F. R.
(2006). Virtual Microscopy for Comparative Pathology. Toxicol Pathol
34: 966-967
[Full Text] -
Lundin, M, Lundin, J, Helin, H, Isola, J
(2004). A digital atlas of breast histopathology: an application of web based virtual microscopy. J. Clin. Pathol.
57: 1288-1291
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
