Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:1165-1167; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.018002
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:1165-1167
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Histopathological assessment of lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma: does triple levelling detect significantly more metastases?

C Verrill, N J Carr, E Wilkinson-Smith, E H Seel

Department of Histopathology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C Verrill
Department of Histopathology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; clareverrill{at}hotmail.com

Aims: Standard practice is to take one section from every lymph node found in colorectal carcinoma resection specimens, to look for metastatic carcinoma. This study evaluates whether assessing three sections separated by 100 µm detects significantly more metastases in nodes than the conventional single section.

Methods: A retrospective study of 100 colorectal carcinoma resection specimens. All blocks containing lymph nodes had two extra histological sections cut (separated by 100 µm) and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The original slide was called level 1, and the extra two sections levels 2 and 3.

Results: Twenty Dukes’s A (equivalent to WHO-UICC stage grouping I, pTNM stage pT1/2N0), 43 Dukes’s B (equivalent to WHO-UICC stage grouping II, pTNM stage pT3/4N0), and 37 Dukes’s C (equivalent to WHO-UICC stage grouping III, pTNM stage at least pN1) cases were examined (total 1453 nodes). Twelve extra metastases (in 11 patients) were discovered in nodes at levels 2 and 3, which were negative in level 1. Ten cases were Dukes’s C and, in one patient, this led to upstaging from N1 to N2 (pTNM classification system). One case was Dukes’s B and the discovery of a single metastasis on level 2 upstaged it to Dukes’s C.

Conclusions: Triple levelling detected more tumour deposits than the conventional single section. In two patients, the staging classification of the lesion was changed, with potentially important implications for prognosis and management.

Abbreviations: H&E, haematoxylin and eosin

Keywords: cancer; colorectal; histopathology; lymph nodes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • McGrath, S., Cross, S., Pritchard, S. A. (2007). Histopathological assessment of lymph nodes in upper gastrointestinal cancer: does triple levelling detect significantly more metastases?. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 1222-1225 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs