Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:193-195; doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.12914
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:193-195
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

SHORT REPORT

Agreement between preoperative core needle biopsy and postoperative invasive breast cancer histopathology is not dependent on the amount of clinical material obtained

R O’Leary1, K Hawkins2, J C S Beazley1, M R J Lansdown3 and A M Hanby4

1 School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2 Clinical Trials and Research Unit, University of Leeds, 17 Springfield Mount, Leeds, LS2 NG, UK
3 Breast Unit, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 TF, UK
4 Department of Histopathology, St James’s University Hospital

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor A M Hanby
Department of Pathology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 F, UK; andrewh{at}pathology.leeds.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

Aims: To establish the relation between the amount of breast core needle biopsy (CNB) material examined and agreement between preoperative and postoperative histopathology parameters in invasive breast cancer.

Methods: The CNB and surgical specimen histopathology reports of 113 patients with invasive breast carcinoma were reviewed and the total amount of CNB material examined for each case was determined. Agreement was calculated for tumour type, grade, mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism, and tubule formation. Associations between the amount of CNB material and histopathology agreement before and after surgery were explored using binary logistic regression.

Results: Tumour type and grade agreed in 65.4% and 61.6% of cases, respectively. The components used to calculate grade—nuclear pleomorphism (57.4%), mitoses (59.4%), and tubule formation (55.6%)—agreed slightly less frequently. The proportion of cases with preoperative and postoperative assessments that agreed did not depend on the number of cores collected or the total amount of material examined.

Conclusion: Neither tumour type and grade, nor the individual components used to calculate grade agreed consistently between the CNB and surgical specimen. The number of cores collected and the total amount of material reviewed by the pathologist does not influence the likelihood of agreement between preoperative and postoperative histopathology reports.

Keywords: agreement; breast; carcinoma; histopathology; preoperative

Abbreviations: CNB, core needle biopsy; NHS, National Health Service


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rakha, E A, Ellis, I O (2007). An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 1300-1306 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Reliability of prognostic factors in breast needle core biopsies.
Jeffrey M. Theaker, et al.
JCP Online, 16 Mar 2004 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs