Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:369-373; doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.013235
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:369-373
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Trends of accuracy of clinical diagnoses of the basic cause of death in a university hospital

M H C Grade, S Zucoloto, J K Kajiwara, M T P Fernandes, L G F Couto, S B Garcia

Department of Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900 - Campus FMRP, USP, 14.049-000, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M H C Grade
Department of Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900 - Campus FMRP, USP, 14.049-000, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil; marcio{at}rpa.fmrp.usp.br

Aims: To determine the agreement between clinical and necropsy diagnoses of the basic cause of death, and to compare the results with those obtained in a previous study carried out at the same university hospital.

Methods: In total, 4828 necropsies, performed between 1990 and 1995 in the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil, were reviewed. Examinations were concluded at the macroscopic part of the necropsy in nearly 35% of the cases. Statistical analysis was carried out using the {kappa} coefficient comparing the clinical diagnosis and the diagnosis obtained after necropsy. The jackknife method was used to identify comparable {kappa} values for the comparison of the two periods.

Results: Compared with the 1978–80 period, a significant increase in diagnostic agreement was seen for the group submitted to complete necropsy, whereas no similar increase was detected when only the macroscopic step was analysed.

Conclusions: There was a discrete tendency to an improved correlation between clinical and postmortem data stated by full necropsy analysis. The findings show that microscopic analysis remains important to confirm the cause of death in many cases. Diagnostic discrepancies remained high, and therefore complete necropsy continues to be an essential instrument for the assessment of clinical diagnosis.

Keywords: clinical diagnoses; autopsy; necropsy; accuracy; error

Abbreviations: HCFMRP-USP, University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo; ICD, International Classification of Diseases


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Saad, R., Yamada, A. T., Pereira da Rosa, F. H. F., Gutierrez, P. S., Mansur, A. J. (2007). Comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a cardiology hospital. Heart 93: 1414-1419 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peres, L. C., Ribeiro-Silva, A. (2005). The Autopsy in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Brazil. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 35: 387-390 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs