Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:705-709; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.025239
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:705-709
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pathological diagnosis of columnar cell lesions of the breast: are there issues of reproducibility?

P H Tan1, B C-S Ho1, S Selvarajan1, W M Yap1, A Hanby2

1 Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608
2 Department of Pathology, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P H Tan
Histopathology Section, Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; gpttph{at}sgh.com.sg

Aims: To assess inter/intraobserver variability in the interpretation of a series of digitised images of columnar cell lesions (CCLs) of the breast.

Methods: After a tutorial on breast CCL, 39 images were presented to seven staff pathologists, who were instructed to categorise the lesions as follows: 0, no columnar cell change (CCC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); 1, CCC; 2, columnar cell hyperplasia; 3, CCC with architectural atypia; 4, CCC with cytological atypia; 5, DCIS. Concordance with the tutor’s diagnosis and degree of agreement among pathologists for each image were determined. The same set of images was re-presented to the pathologists one week later, their diagnoses collated, and inter/intraobservor reproducibility and level of agreement for individual images analysed.

Results: Diagnostic reproducibility with the tutor ranged from moderate to substantial ({kappa} values, 0.439–0.697) in the first exercise. At repeat evaluation, intraobserver agreement was fair to perfect ({kappa} values, 0.271–0.832), whereas concordance with the tutor varied from fair to substantial ({kappa} values, 0.334–0.669). There was unanimous agreement on more images during the second exercise, mainly because of agreement on the diagnosis of DCIS. The lowest agreement was seen for CCC with cytological atypia.

Conclusions: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement is good for DCIS, but more effort is needed to improve diagnostic consistency in the category of CCC with cytological atypia. Continued awareness and study of these lesions are necessary to enhance recognition and understanding.

Abbreviations: CCC, columnar cell changes; CCH, columnar cell hyperplasia; CCL, columnar cell lesion; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ

Keywords: columnar cell lesions; cytological atypia; reproducibility; {kappa} statistic; ductal carcinoma in situ


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Darvishian, F., Singh, B., Simsir, A., Ye, W., Cangiarella, J. F. (2009). Atypia on Breast Core Needle Biopsies: Reproducibility and Significance. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 39: 270-276 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lim, C N, Ho, B C S, Bay, B H, Yip, G, Tan, P H (2006). Nuclear morphometry in columnar cell lesions of the breast: is it useful?. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 1283-1286 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs