© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Pathological diagnosis of columnar cell lesions of the breast: are there issues of reproducibility?
1 Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608
2 Department of Pathology, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P H Tan
Histopathology Section, Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; gpttph{at}sgh.com.sg
Aims: To assess inter/intraobserver variability in the interpretation of a series of digitised images of columnar cell lesions (CCLs) of the breast.
Methods: After a tutorial on breast CCL, 39 images were presented to seven staff pathologists, who were instructed to categorise the lesions as follows: 0, no columnar cell change (CCC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); 1, CCC; 2, columnar cell hyperplasia; 3, CCC with architectural atypia; 4, CCC with cytological atypia; 5, DCIS. Concordance with the tutors diagnosis and degree of agreement among pathologists for each image were determined. The same set of images was re-presented to the pathologists one week later, their diagnoses collated, and inter/intraobservor reproducibility and level of agreement for individual images analysed.
Results: Diagnostic reproducibility with the tutor ranged from moderate to substantial (
values, 0.4390.697) in the first exercise. At repeat evaluation, intraobserver agreement was fair to perfect (
values, 0.2710.832), whereas concordance with the tutor varied from fair to substantial (
values, 0.3340.669). There was unanimous agreement on more images during the second exercise, mainly because of agreement on the diagnosis of DCIS. The lowest agreement was seen for CCC with cytological atypia.
Conclusions: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement is good for DCIS, but more effort is needed to improve diagnostic consistency in the category of CCC with cytological atypia. Continued awareness and study of these lesions are necessary to enhance recognition and understanding.
Abbreviations: CCC, columnar cell changes; CCH, columnar cell hyperplasia; CCL, columnar cell lesion; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ
Keywords:
columnar cell lesions; cytological atypia; reproducibility;
statistic; ductal carcinoma in situ
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Darvishian, F., Singh, B., Simsir, A., Ye, W., Cangiarella, J. F.
(2009). Atypia on Breast Core Needle Biopsies: Reproducibility and Significance. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science
39: 270-276
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Lim, C N, Ho, B C S, Bay, B H, Yip, G, Tan, P H
(2006). Nuclear morphometry in columnar cell lesions of the breast: is it useful?. J. Clin. Pathol.
59: 1283-1286
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
