Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:747-750; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.022129
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:747-750
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Use of native or platelet count adjusted platelet rich plasma for platelet aggregation measurements

H Mani, B Luxembourg, C Kläffling, M Erbe, E Lindhoff-Last

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Hs.13a EG, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr H Mani
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Hs.13a EG, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; helenmani{at}gmx.de

Background: It is still not clear whether native or platelet count adjusted platelet rich plasma (PRP) should be used for platelet aggregation measurements.

Aim: To evaluate the necessity of using adjusted PRP in platelet function testing.

Methods: Platelet aggregation with native PRP and adjusted PRP (platelet count: 250/nl, obtained by diluting native PRP with platelet poor plasma) was performed on the Behring Coagulation Timer (BCT®) using ADP, collagen, and arachidonic acid as agonists. Healthy subjects, patients on antiplatelet treatment, and patients with thrombocytosis (platelet counts in PRP > 1250/nl) were investigated.

Results: No significant differences in the maximum aggregation response were seen when using either native or adjusted PRP from healthy subjects and patients on antiplatelet treatment. Nevertheless, some patients taking aspirin or clopidogrel showed reduced inhibition of ADP and arachidonic acid induced aggregation in adjusted PRP but not in native PRP. The maximum velocity of healthy subjects and patients on antiplatelet treatment varied significantly as a result of the degree of dilution of the adjusted PRP. Surprisingly, the BCT provided good results when measuring platelet aggregation of native PRP from patients with thrombocytosis, whereas commonly used aggregometers could not analyse platelet aggregation of native PRP in these patients.

Conclusion: The time consuming process of PRP adjustment may not be necessary for platelet aggregation measurements. Moreover, using adjusted PRP for monitoring aspirin or clopidogrel treatment may falsify results. Therefore, it may be better to use native PRP for platelet aggregation measurements, even in patients with thrombocytosis.

Abbreviations: ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; BCT, Behring Coagulation Timer; PPP, platelet poor plasma; PRP, platelet rich plasma

Keywords: platelet aggregation; platelet rich plasma; antiplatelet treatment; thrombocytosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lordkipanidze, M., Pharand, C., Nguyen, T. A., Schampaert, E., Palisaitis, D. A., Diodati, J. G. (2008). Comparison of four tests to assess inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease patients. Eur Heart J 29: 2877-2885 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs