Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2006;59:1029-1038; doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.035337
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

MY APPROACH

Diagnosis and grading of dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus

R D Odze

Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R D Odze
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA;rodze{at}partners.org

ABSTRACT

This review focuses on the pathological features of dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Two categorisation schemes are used for grading dysplasia in the gastrointestinal tract, including Barrett’s oesophagus. The inflammatory bowel disease dysplasia morphology study group system is the one most commonly used in the USA. However, some European and most far Eastern countries use the Vienna classification system, which uses the term "non-invasive neoplasia" instead of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and also uses the term "suspicious for invasive carcinoma" for lesions that show equivocal cytological or architectural features of tissue invasion. The degree of dysplasia is based on a combination of cytological and architectural atypia. However, the precise number of HGD crypts that is necessary to upgrade a biopsy from LGD to HGD has never been investigated and varies widely among expert gastrointestinal pathologists. The extent of dysplasia, particularly LGD, has also been recognised recently as an important prognostic parameter in Barrett’s oesophagus. Other problematic areas of dysplasia interpretation include differentiation of regenerating epithelium versus LGD and separating HGD from carcinoma. Dysplasia associated with macroscopically visible lesions, such as ulcers, nodules or polyps, carry a high risk of synchronous or metachronous adenocarcinoma. Recently, immunostaining for {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA-racemase has been shown to have a high degree of specificity for detection of dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus and may be used to help distinguish negative from positive biopsies in this condition. In this review, the problematic areas in dysplasia interpretation are outlined and a specific approach to these issues is discussed.

Abbreviations: AMACR, {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA-racemase; BCDA, basal crypt dysplasia-like atypia; HGD, high-grade dysplasia; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; LGD, low-grade dysplasia; N/C ratio, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sabo, E., Meitner, P. A., Tavares, R., Corless, C. L., Lauwers, G. Y., Moss, S. F., Resnick, M. B. (2008). Expression Analysis of Barrett's Esophagus-Associated High-Grade Dysplasia in Laser Capture Microdissected Archival Tissue. Clin. Cancer Res. 14: 6440-6448 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs