Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2006;59:250-254; doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.028589
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Claudins in differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pleura

Y Soini1, V Kinnula2, K Kahlos3, P Pääkkö1

1 Department of Pathology, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
2 Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Division, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
3 Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Division, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Y Soini
Department of Pathology, Oulu Central University Hospital, OYS, PO Box 50, 90029 Oulu, Finland; ylermi.soini{at}ppshp.fi

Aim: To study the expression of claudins in mesothelioma and metastatic pleural adenocarcinoma.

Methods: Immunohistochemical staining of claudins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 was studied in 35 malignant mesotheliomas and the expression compared with 24 cases of pleural metastatic adenocarcinoma. All cases were also immunostained with calretinin.

Results: Claudin 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 expression was seen in 40%, 80%, 18%, 23%, 14%, and 43% of mesotheliomas, respectively, while the corresponding figures for adenocarcinoma were 100%, 88%, 90%, 100%, 50%, and 92%. Claudins 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7 were significantly less positive in mesothelioma than in metastatic adenocarcinoma, while no difference was observed for claudin 2. Claudins 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7 were also inversely associated with calretinin positivity. Sarcomatoid and biphasic mesothelioma subtypes appeared more negative for these claudins than pure epithelioid subtypes. Claudin expression was not associated with survival of patients with malignant mesotheliomas.

Conclusions: The results show that malignant mesotheliomas have a lower expression of claudins 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7 than adenocarcinomas, and their expression could thus be used as an adjunct in differential diagnosis between the two. The difference was most evident for claudins 3 and 4, which were nearly as good as calretinin in mesothelioma detection. Sarcomatoid and biphasic mesotheliomas showed expression of these claudins only occasionally, which could be due to or contribute to their less epithelial appearance.

Abbreviations: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen

Keywords: claudin; mesothelioma; cancer; adhesion; tight junction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Nemeth, Z., Szasz, A. M., Tatrai, P., Nemeth, J., Gyorffy, H., Somoracz, A., Szijarto, A., Kupcsulik, P., Kiss, A., Schaff, Z. (2009). Claudin-1, -2, -3, -4, -7, -8, and -10 Protein Expression in Biliary Tract Cancers. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 57: 113-121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs