Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 1 September 2006. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.038216
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:351-354
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

BEST PRACTICE

Experiences from the front-line routine consenting of surplus surgically removed tissue: without investment by the National Health Service fully informed consent for all is not available

Janet Wheeler1, Monica Agarwal2, John Sugden3, Meriel Bladon3, Philip Quirke4

1 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust/University of Leeds Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds, UK
2 North West Deanery, Preston, UK
3 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
4 University of Leeds, Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to:
MrsJ Wheeler
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust/University of Leeds Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; janet.wheeler{at}leedsth.nhs.uk

ABSTRACT

The study investigated the routine introduction of a new surgical consent form containing a tissue consent section to investigate patient attitudes to the use of surplus tissue for research (after the Alder Hey inquiry) and also the differing approaches by consent takers. All surgical consent forms received in histopathology for the same 2-month period in 2 consecutive years were analysed, recording available information about the specimen, the tissue consent section and, for the second year, the consent taker. The findings showed that <5% of patients whose views were recorded disagreed with the use of their tissue for research. They also showed that the number of completed forms sent to histopathology had increased but the pattern of completion had changed very little. A wide variation between departments and also between clinicians was apparent in the levels of completion of the tissue consent section, suggesting wide variability in the quality of the consenting process. When asked, patients rarely object (<5%) but if the highest standards of consent for surgical tissue are to be achieved and the wishes of patients to donate tissue are to be effectively recorded then new resources or approaches will be needed for this process.

Abbreviations: NHS, National Health Service


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Vermeulen, E, Schmidt, M K, Aaronson, N K, Kuenen, M, van der Valk, P, Sietses, C, van den Tol, P, van Leeuwen, F E (2009). Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment. J. Clin. Pathol. 62: 275-278 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs