Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 15 November 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.053504
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:621-622
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Comparison of examination of the entire uterine cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer

A G Nayar1, P A Cross1, J N Bulmer2, S Deen3, A El-Sherif2

1 Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
2 Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3 Department of Cellular Pathology, Nottingham University Hospital, Queen’s Medical Centre Campus, UK

Dr P A Cross, Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear NE9 6SX, UK; paul.cross{at}ghnt.nhs.uk

Background: Cervical involvement by endometrial cancer alters the FIGO stage and determines clinical management, but there are no accepted guidelines for cervical sampling of these cases.

Aim: To assess whether sampling more than two "routine" blocks of the cervix (anterior and posterior) alters the pathological staging of hysterectomy specimens for endometrial cancer.

Methods: Histological involvement of the cervix was prospectively compared in hysterectomies performed for proven endometrial cancer (n = 61). Specimens had two "routine" blocks taken from anterior and posterior cervix; all of the remaining cervix was also processed for histological assessment.

Results: 61 cases of endometrial cancer had the entire uterine cervix processed. There were 54 cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and 7 special types. Twelve cases had cervical involvement (stage 2A or 2B), and seven cases were stage 3A or above, of which three also had cervical involvement. In none of the 61 cases did the additional cervical blocks (n = 544) taken alter the staging made on the "routine" blocks.

Conclusion: Sampling of two blocks from the cervix appears sufficient for histological staging of endometrial cancer in hysterectomy specimens.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Heatley, M K (2008). Comparison of examination of the entire cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer: comment on a paper. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 1149-1149 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs