Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 6 March 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.049049
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:669-671
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Clinical importance of the presence of giant cells in temporal arteritis

A T Armstrong1, W B Tyler2, G C Wood3, T M Harrington1

1 Department of Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
3 Center of Health Research, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA

Dr T Harrington, Department of Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822, USA; Tharrington{at}geisinger.edu

Background: The clinical significance of giant cells seen on temporal artery biopsy in temporal arteritis is unknown.

Aim: To help define the prognostic value of the presence of giant cells in temporal arteritis.

Methods: The clinical course of all patients with biopsy proven temporal arteritis from 1994 to 2004 was reviewed. The 92 patients were divided into those with giant cells (GC) (n = 76) seen on biopsy and those with no giant cells (NGC) (n = 16). Clinical findings were compared between groups. An additional analysis combined results with a previous study at the same institution to compare occurrence of blindness.

Results: The GC group had a higher proportion of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (36.8%) compared to the NGC group (12.5%) (p = 0.059). There was no significant difference in patient age, sex, sedimentation rate, or presenting symptoms. The length of time treated with corticosteroids and relapse rate was nearly identical for both groups. When combining data with the previous study, in the GC group 21/109 (19%) developed blindness, while only 2/34 (6%) became blind in the NGC group (p = 0.11).

Conclusion: The presence of giant cells is not a significant factor in determining treatment or clinical progression of temporal arteritis. However, results showed the GC group to have three times the occurrence of blindness and PMR compared to the NGC group. Although the differences were not significant, this analysis suggests an association with giant cells and more aggressive disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs