Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 20 August 2009. doi:10.1136/jcp.2009.064444
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2009;62:939-941
Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Diagnosis of conjunctivitis in primary care: comparison of two different culture procedures

E Tellegen1, G ter Riet1,2, J H Sloos3, H C P M van Weert1

1 Academic Medical Center, Department of General Practice, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Horten Centre, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Medical Center Alkmaar, Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Alkmaar, The Netherlands

Correspondence to Dr E Tellegen, Academic Medical Center, Department of General Practice, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands; e.tellegen{at}wanadoo.nl

Background: In general practice, infectious conjunctivitis is a common and mostly (64%) self-limiting disorder. In case of an aberrant course or severe symptoms, a general practitioner may take a culture. Direct inoculation is considered the reference standard, but usually a swab is sent to a laboratory.

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of the swab, transported by surface mail with direct inoculation.

Methods: 19 general practitioners took two samples of the conjunctiva from 88 patients with symptoms suggestive of infectious conjunctivitis by rolling a cotton swab across the conjunctiva of the lower fornix. One swab was used to inoculate three agar plates directly, while the other was sent in a Stuart medium to the laboratory and inoculated at the time of arrival. The numbers of positive cultures of both methods were compared.

Results: A pathogen was found in 31 of 88 samples (35% (95% CI 26 to 46)). Surprisingly, the number of positive cultures was higher for the Stuart medium (27/88) than for direct inoculation (23/88). The difference was 4.5% (90% CI 0 to 12, p = 0.388; one-sided McNemar test for paired proportions). In five of the 19 samples that were positive in both tests, the cultured pathogens were different.

Conclusions: The Stuart medium detected more bacteria than direct inoculation. The lower 90% CI, testing non-inferiority at p = 0.05, indicates that it is unlikely that the Stuart medium misses any positive cultures compared with direct inoculation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs