Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 20 January 2009. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.062620
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2009;62:519-524
Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Is histological diagnosis of primary liver carcinomas with fibrous stroma reproducible among experts?

G Malouf1, B Falissard2, D Azoulay2, F Callea3, L D Ferrell4, Z D Goodman5, Y Hayashi6, H-C Hsu7, S G Hubscher8, M Kojiro9, I O Ng10, A C Paterson11, M Reynes2, E-S Zafrani12, J-F Emile1

1 EA4340, Versailles SQY University and Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne, France
2 Paul Brousse Hospital, APHP, Villejuif, France
3 Bambino Gesù Hospital, Rome, Italy
4 University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
5 Armed Force Institute of Pathology, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
6 Faculty of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
7 National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
8 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
9 Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
10 University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
11 University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa
12 Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Créteil, France

Jean-François Emile, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Pathology Department, 9 Av. Ch. De Gaulle, F-92104 Boulogne, France; jean-francois.emile{at}apr.aphp.fr

Aims: In the era of targeted therapeutics, histological typing of hepatobiliary carcinomas has major clinical implications. Little is known about the reproducibility of the pathological diagnosis of primary liver carcinomas. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the worldwide variation in the pathological expert diagnoses of primary liver carcinomas with fibrous stroma in patients who did not have cirrhosis.

Methods: A single set of slides was selected from 25 tumours, and this set was reviewed independently by 12 pathologists who have worldwide expertise in liver tumours. Reproducibility of the diagnoses was evaluated by Light’s {kappa}, and diagnoses were clustered by multidimensional scaling. Immunohistochemistry was performed after histological review.

Results: The interobserver reproducibility for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes and cholangiocarcinomas was poor ({kappa} 0.23–0.52), even when the experts considered that the diagnosis required no additional stains or clinical information. Interestingly, multidimensional scaling revealed three main clusters of tumours: hepatocellular carcinoma with no other specifications (n = 13), fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 3) and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 9). Using immunohistochemistry, these histological clusters correlated with expression of anti-hepatocyte and anti-cytokeratin 19 (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the poor reproducibility among experts of the pathological diagnosis of primary liver carcinomas with fibrous stroma in patients who did not have cirrhosis, and highlight that the systematic use of immunohistochemistry may improve the diagnostic accuracy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs