JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 3 August 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.051326
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raab, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Becich, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raab, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Becich, M. J.

Histopathology

Effect of lean method implementation in the histopathology section of an anatomic pathology laboratory

Stephen Spencer Raab 1*, Dana M. Grzybicki 1, Jennifer L. Condel 1, William R. Stewart 1, Brian D. Turcsanyi 1, Laura K. Mahood 1 and Michael J. Becich 1

1 University of Pittsburgh, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: raabss{at}upmc.edu.

Accepted 16 July 2007


*   Abstract

Background: In the United States, the lack of processes standardization in histopathology laboratories leads to less than optimal quality, errors, inefficiency, and increased costs. The effectiveness of large scale quality improvement initiatives rarely has been evaluated.

Aim: To measure the effect of implementation of a Lean quality improvement process on the efficiency and quality of a histopathology laboratory section.

Methods: We performed a non-concurrent interventional cohort study from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2006 and implemented the Lean process on January 1, 2004. We also compared the productivity of the Lean histopathology section to a sister histopathology section that did not implement Lean processes. We measured pre- and post-Lean specimen turn-around time and productivity ratios (work units/full time equivalents). For 200 Lean interventions, we used a 5-part Likert scale to assess the impact on error, success, and complexity.

Results: In the Lean laboratory, the mean monthly productivity ratio increased from 3,439 and 4,074 work units/full time equivalents (P < 0.001) as the mean daily histopathology section specimen turn-around time decreased from 9.7 to 9.0 hours (P = 0.01). The Lean histopathology section had a higher productivity ratio compared to a sister histopathology section (1,598 work units/full time equivalents, P < 0.001) that did not implement Lean processes. The mean impact, success, and complexity of interventions were 2.4, 2.7, and 2.5, respectively. The mean number of specific error causes affected by individual interventions was 2.6.

Conclusion: We conclude that Lean process implementation improved histopathology section efficiency and quality.

Key Words: Lean, anatomic pathology, efficiency, error reduction, quality







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.