Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2008

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 12 May 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.056465
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

Inter-disciplinary

Integration of conventional cytogenetics (G-banding), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (i-FISH) for the detection of genomic rearrangements in acute leukemia

Peter McGrattan 1*, Sabrina-Leigh Campbell 2, Robert Cuthbert 3, Francis GC Jones 4, Mary F McMullin 4 and Mervyn Humphreys 1

1 Northern Ireland Regional Genetics Centre, Northern Ireland
2 Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland
3 Department of Haematology, Belfast City Hospital, Northern Ireland
4 Haematology, Belfast City Hospital, Northern Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter.mcgrattan{at}belfasttrust.hscni.net.

Accepted 10 April 2008


Abstract

Aims: To screen for genomic imbalances in patients with acute leukemia using conventional (G-banding) and molecular (CGH and FISH) methods to see if an integrative screening approach increases abnormality detection rate. Methods: G-banded analysis was performed on unstimulated BM or PB cells after short-term (24-hour) culture. CGH was performed on reference (control) and neoplastic (test patient) genomic DNA extracted from BM or PB samples. i-FISH was selectively carried out at disease diagnosis on AML and ALL patients using conventional methods. Results: Genomic rearrangements were detected in 4, 7 and 6 patients using G-banding, CGH and i-FISH respectively. Discordance in results between G-banding, CGH and/or i-FISH was found in 7 of the 12 patients screened. G-banding and CGH, when used individually, detected a genomic imbalance/rearrangement in 33.3% and 58.3% of the patients screened respectively. However, when both screening methods were integrated, the abnormality detection rate increased to 66.7%. This detection rate increased further to 75.0% with the use of i-FISH screening. Conclusions: The advantages and disadvantages of using G-banding, CGH and i-FISH as either stand alone or integrated screening methods for the detection and characterization of genomic imbalances in acute leukemia are clearly demonstrated. Abnormality detection rate significantly increased when an integrated screening approach was employed which could potentially provide valuable information for risk stratification in patients with acute leukemia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs