Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2009

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 15 May 2009. doi:10.1136/jcp.2009.065326
Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

Molecular Pathology

Biotin-Free systems provide stronger Immunohistochemical signal in Estrogen receptor evaluation of breast cancer

Rafael Malagoli Rocha 1*, Keith Miller 2, Fernando A Soares 1, Natalia Schenka 3, José Vassallo 1 and Helenice Gobbi 4

1 Hospital do Câncer A C Camargo, Brazil
2 U C L, United Kingdom
3 Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil
4 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rafael.malagoli{at}gmail.com.

Accepted 1 May 2009


Abstract

Aims: Biotin-free polymeric visualization systems (BFPS) were compared to streptavidin-biotin systems (SABS) in the evaluation of immunoreactivity for estrogen receptor (ER) in breast carcinomas.

Methods: The anti-estrogen antibody clone SP1 was employed on a tissue microarray containing 320 breast carcinomas. Eleven different detection systems were used: six BFPS of second generation (Advance, Novolink, SuperPicTure, PicTure Max, Super Sensitive Non-Biotin HRP, and Mouse/Rabbit Polydetector HRP/DAB), one BFPS of first generation (EnVision+), and four SABS (LSAB+, EasyPath, Super Sensitive, and Mouse/Rabbit Immunodetector HRP/DAB). The slides were digitalized using the Mirax scanner and the resulting images were analyzed both by an automated method and by visual analysis using the Allred's score system considering positive nuclear staining. Cytoplasm staining was also separeted evaluated.

Results: The BFPS Advance and Novolink showed the highest scores by visual analysis, and additionally detected two positive cases which were considered negative using the other detection systems. Likewise, these systems, together with the SAB LSAB+, showed higher staining intensity by the automated method. BFPS revealed no cytoplasm staining, in opposition to the SABS.

Conclusions: The second generation BFPS, especially Advance and Novolink, provide stronger and sharper nuclear immunohistochemical signal as compared to most SABS, without nonspecific cytoplasm staining. As in few instances these detection systems show discordant results in relation to SABS, further studies correlating these findings to therapeutic response are necessary. BFPS may represent a high quality tool both for research and clinical evalutation of estrogen receptor in breast cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs