Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:426-428; doi:10.1136/jcp.56.6.426
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:426-428
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Association of Clinical Pathologists

EDITORIAL

The Caldicott report

The Caldicott report and patient confidentiality

M A Crook

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M A Crook, Guy’s, St Thomas’s, and University Hospital Lewisham, London SE13 6LH, UK;martin.crook@uhl.nhs.uk


An introduction for the pathologist

Keywords: Caldicott committee; patient confidentiality; recommendations

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1997, the Caldicott committee presented its report on patient confidentiality.1 The impetus behind this were concerns about patient information and security.2,3 For example, there had been reports in the press that patient hospital records could be freely accessed and that patient notes had ended up lying around in village streets for all and sundry to read.

The committee came up with six main principles as follows.

  1. One should justify the purpose of holding patient information.
  2. Information on patients should only be held if absolutely necessary.
  3. Use only the minimum of information that is required.
  4. Information access should be on a strict need to know basis.
  5. Everyone in the organisation should be aware of their responsibilities.
  6. The organisation should understand and comply with the law.

National Health Service (NHS) organisations should have Caldicott guardians who have responsibilities to safeguard and govern the use of patient information. The . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Deacon, S., Atack, N. E., Clark, S., Mitchell, C. N. (2007). Current Products and Practice: How to create and manage a regional orthognathic database. J. Orthod. 34: 143-150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs