Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:243-244; doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.013433
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:243-244
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

VIEW POINT

Chemical pathology

The casino of life

P J Twomey1, T M Reynolds2, A S Wierzbicki3

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Room S6114, Level 2, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
2 Clinical Chemistry Department, Queen’s Hospital, Belvedere Road, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 0RB, UK
3 Department of Chemical Pathology, Guy’s and St Thomas’s Hospital, 5th Floor, North Wing, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P J Twomey
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Room S6114 Level 2, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK; taptwomey@aol.com


Markets, mathematics, and medicine: should chemical pathology look to the stockmarket?

Keywords: information technology; analytical variation; chronic management; intra-individual variation; screening

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Medicine is continuously changing—screening tools, diagnostic assays, and new medications and treatment modalities are rapidly being developed. However, in this age of super fast computers, one question that is not often asked is whether healthcare professionals are making the most of the currently available patient data? Chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia are increasing in prevalence at an alarming rate. At the same time, treatment guidelines are evolving and the audit of treatment targets is now being instituted as an objective means of measuring quality. However, there is relatively little research into the examination of the effects of such targets for individual patients as opposed to patient populations. We have previously shown that the effect of individual risk factor variation on screening for coronary heart disease can be considerable.1 So, how can we rationally overcome this variability in the monitoring of chronic clinical conditions? As . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Twomey, P. J., Viljoen, A., Reynolds, T. M., Wierzbicki, A. S. (2004). Biological Variation in HbA1c Predicts Risk of Retinopathy and Nephropathy in Type 1 Diabetes: Response to McCarter et al.. Diabetes Care 27: 2569-2569 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs