J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 6 March 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.054833
Chemical Pathology |
Reference change values- how useful are they?
1 University of Cape Town & National Health Laboratory Service, South Africa
2 University of Cape Town, South Africa
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fierdoz.omar{at}uct.ac.za.
Accepted 11 January 2008
Abstract
Clinicians use several approaches in the interpretation of laboratory results. These include comparison with pre-determined cut-off values or reference values, or a comparison between two sequential results for a specific analyte1. Each has its own merits. The latter is the focus of this editorial.
A simple comparison between two sequential results is not as straightforward as it seems. It should be remembered that each result is associated with its own inherent random variation, meaning that each result obtained is, in fact, a dispersion rather than a singular value. This random variation is comprises both variation associated with laboratory activity (pre-analytical and analytical variation) and inherent biological variation (intra-individual).
Relevant Article
- What is a significant difference between sequential laboratory results?Calf muscle pain can indicate localised vasculitis
- W S A Smellie
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008 61: 419-425.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
