Article Text

PDF

Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens.
  1. A J Robertson,
  2. J M Anderson,
  3. J S Beck,
  4. R A Burnett,
  5. S R Howatson,
  6. F D Lee,
  7. A M Lessells,
  8. K M McLaren,
  9. S M Moss,
  10. J G Simpson
  1. Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.

    Abstract

    Sections from 100 cervical biopsy specimens were studied by 12 consultant histopathologists to determine the robustness of the existing pathology terminology and classification. Analysis by kappa statistics showed good agreement in the diagnosis of CIN 3 and squamous carcinoma but an inability to distinguish accurately between the lesser grades of CIN. It is recommended that the classification be changed to low grade (present CIN 1 and 2) and high grade (present CIN 3) categories alone. There was very poor agreement in the identification of cellular changes associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.