Article Text

PDF

Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
  1. T Creagh,
  2. J E Bridger,
  3. E Kupek,
  4. D E Fish,
  5. E Martin-Bates,
  6. M J Wilkins
  1. Department of Histopathology and Cytopathology, St Mary's Hospital, London.

    Abstract

    AIMS--To evaluate the interobserver variation in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial lesions, including the new category "borderline abnormalities of uncertain significance" (BAUS) which has not been tested before. METHODS--Biopsy specimens of 122 patients were reviewed by five histopathologists and the diagnoses subjected to kappa statistical analysis. RESULTS--There was poor interobserver agreement in all categories, particularly between BAUS and normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS--The current guidelines for the histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and BAUS are poorly reproducible.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.