Article Text

Download PDFPDF
M2-AMA do not directly produce ANCA indirect immunofluorescence patterns
  1. R C W Wong1,
  2. R Wilson1,
  3. J Neil1,
  4. S Adelstein2,
  5. R A Silvestrini3,
  6. E M Benson3,
  7. L Powell4
  1. 1Division of Immunology, Queensland Health Pathology Services,Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston 4029, Brisbane, Australia
  2. 2Department of Clinical Immunology,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
  3. 3Department of Immunopathology, ICPMR,Westmead Hospital, Australia
  4. 4Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The importance of distinguishing atypical cytoplasmic indirect immunofluorescence patterns from the “classic”, centrally accentuated cytoplasmic immunofluorescence pattern on ethanol fixed human neutrophils has recently been re-emphasised.1–3 Autoantibodies to other cytoplasmic autoantigens such as antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA), antismooth muscle antibodies, and antiribosomal-P antibodies have also recently been reported to produce atypical cytoplasmic immunofluorescence patterns on ethanol fixed human neutrophils.1 However, an alternative explanation is that the atypical cytoplasmic immunofluorescence patterns might be produced by concomitant antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in these sera, especially in cases of autoimmune liver disease. Therefore, we investigated: (1) whether sera containing AMA with confirmed M2 specificity4 produced positive indirect immunofluorescence …

    View Full Text