Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Morphological identification of the patterns of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their importance
  1. Rodolfo Montironi1,
  2. Roberta Mazzucchelli1,
  3. Ferran Algaba2,
  4. Antonio Lopez-Beltran3
  1. 1Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, University of Ancona, Ospedale Regionale, I-60020 Torrette, Ancona, Italy
  2. 2Institute of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Hospital de la Santa Crue i Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3Unit of Anatomic Pathology, Cordoba University Medical School, Avda. Menendez Pidal s/n, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
  1. Professor Montironi email: r.montironi{at}popcsi.unian.it

Abstract

High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostatic carcinoma. PIN has a high predictive value as a marker for carcinoma, and its identification in biopsy specimens warrants repeat biopsy for concurrent or subsequent carcinoma. The only methods of detection are biopsy and transurethral resection; PIN does not greatly raise the concentration of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) or its derivatives, does not induce a palpable mass, and cannot be detected by ultrasound. Androgen deprivation decreases the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that this form of treatment might play a role in chemoprevention. Radiotherapy is also associated with a decreased incidence of PIN.

  • prostate
  • prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
  • intraductal dysplasia
  • intraductal carcinoma
  • atypical adenomatous hyperplasia
  • prostatic adenocarcinoma
  • chemoprevention

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes