Article Text

PDF
Lymphatic vessel density in the neoplastic progression of Barrett’s oesophagus to adenocarcinoma
  1. M-A Brundler1,3,
  2. J A Harrison2,
  3. B de Saussure1,
  4. M de Perrot1,
  5. M S Pepper2,4
  1. 1Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Geneva Medical Centre, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
  2. 2Department of Morphology, University of Geneva Medical Centre
  3. 3Birmingham Children’s Hospital Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK
  4. 4NetCare Molecular Medicine Institute, Unitas Hospital, 0140 Lyttelton, Pretoria, South Africa
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor M S Pepper
 NetCare Molecular Medicine Institute, Unitas Hospital, Clifton Avenue, 0140 Lyttleton, Pretoria, South Africa; mpepper{at}doctors.netcare.co.za

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm with poor prognosis as a result of early lymph node metastasis.

Aims: To measure lymphatic vessel density (LVD) in the neoplastic progression from Barrett’s metaplasia to adenocarcinoma and determine whether LVD can predict the risk of cancer. In addition, to correlate LVD with lymph node metastasis and assess whether LVD could be used as a prognostic indicator for outcome or survival.

Methods: LVD and microvascular density (MVD) were assessed after immunohistochemical staining of vessels in Barrett’s metaplasia, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma tissues and were correlated with clinicopathological features.

Results: LVD was significantly reduced in adenocarcinoma, being half that seen in normal stomach/oesophagus or metaplasia/dysplasia. LVD did not correlate with tumour grade, stage, or clinical outcome; however, patients who had either lymph node metastasis or invasion of tumour cells into peritumorous lymphatic vessels had a significantly worse overall survival. MVD was also assessed as a prognostic marker; its increase appeared to be linked more with the development of Barrett’s metaplasia than adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions: The reduction in lymphatic vessel numbers was not useful for determining disease outcome in the patient group studied. It is the entry of tumour cells into pre-existing peritumorous lymphatic vessels that confers a significantly worse overall survival.

  • LVD, lymphatic vessel density
  • LYVE-1, lymphatic endothelium specific hyaluronan receptor
  • MVD, microvascular density
  • VEGFR-3, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3
  • lymphangiogenesis
  • lymphatic vessel density
  • Barrett’s metaplasia
  • dysplasia
  • oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.