rss
J Clin Pathol 2007;60:225-234 doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.040014
  • Review

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 6

  1. W S A Smellie1,
  2. J Forth2,
  3. J J Coleman3,
  4. W Irvine4,
  5. P C Dore5,
  6. G Handley6,
  7. D G Williams7,
  8. P J Galloway8,
  9. K G Kerr9,
  10. R Herriot10,
  11. G P Spickett11,
  12. T M Reynolds12
  1. 1Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK
  2. 2Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics, Bede House, All Saints Business Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  3. 3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Investigation Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
  4. 4Department of Microbiology, School of Molecular Medical Sciences, University Hospital, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
  5. 5Department of Immunology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull, UK
  6. 6Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
  7. 7Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland, UK
  8. 8Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow, UK
  9. 9Department of Microbiology, Harrogate District Hospital, Harrogate, UK
  10. 10Department of Immunology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Forresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
  11. 11Department of Immnology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, UK
  12. 12Department of Chemical Pathology, Queen’s Hospital, Burton on Trent, Staffs, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr W S A Smellie
 Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK; info{at}smellie.com
  • Accepted 13 June 2006
  • Published Online First 5 July 2006

Abstract

This sixth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory monitoring in hypertension and heart failure abnormalities; (2) markers of inflammatory joint disease; (3) laboratory investigation of chronic diarrhoea; and (4) mumps and chickenpox. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a precis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus based rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 5 July 2006

  • * These organisations contributed direct funding to support the project start up.

  • This work has been supported (in alphabetical order) by the Association of Clinical Biochemists*, Association of Clinical Pathologists*, Association of Medical Microbiologists, British Society for Haematology, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Pathologists* and the Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics in Newcastle (SCHIN), representatives of whom have contributed to the reviewing process. The opinions stated are however those of the authors.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.