Article Text

See original article:

Download PDFPDF

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 8
Free
  1. W S A Smellie1,
  2. K K Hampton2,
  3. R Bowlees3,
  4. S C Martin4,
  5. N Shaw3,
  6. J Hoffman5,
  7. J P Ng6,
  8. S M Mackenzie7,
  9. C van Heyningen8
  1. 1Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, UK
  2. 2Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  3. 3Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics, All Saints Business Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  4. 4Department of Clinical Biochemistry, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmonds, UK
  5. 5Department of Histopathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, UK
  6. 6Department of Haematology, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
  7. 7Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  8. 8Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr W S A Smellie
 Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK; info{at}smellie.com

Abstract

This eighth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) sodium abnormalities; (ii) faecal occult blood testing; (iii) warfarin management; and (iv) sputum cytology in diagnosis of bronchopulmonary malignancy. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

  • Best practice
  • evidence-based medicine
  • inter-disciplinary
  • primary care

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 15 December 2006

  • Funding: This work has been supported (in alphabetical order) by the Association of Clinical Biochemists*, Association of Clinical Pathologists*, Association of Medical Microbiologists, British Society for Haematology, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Pathologists* and the Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics in Newcastle (SCHIN), representatives of whom have contributed to the reviewing process. The opinions stated are however those of the authors. *These organisations contributed direct funding to support the project start up.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Linked Articles

  • Corrections
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists