Article Text

PDF
External quality assurance of HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation testing: results of a UK NEQAS pilot scheme
  1. John M S Bartlett1,
  2. Merdol Ibrahim2,
  3. Keith Miller2,
  4. Bharat Jasani3,
  5. John M Morgan3,
  6. Ian Ellis4,
  7. Elaine Kay5,
  8. Hilary Magee6,
  9. Sarah Barnett7
  1. 1Endocrine Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme, University College London, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  4. 4University of Nottingham, Molecular Medical Sciences, Department of Histopathology, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
  5. 5Department of Histopathology, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  6. 6Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating the National Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  7. 7University College London, Advanced Diagnostics, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr J M S Bartlett
 Endocrine Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK; John.Bartlett{at}ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Background and Aims: Trastuzumab provides clinical benefit for advanced and early breast cancer patients whose tumours over-express or have gene amplification of the HER2 oncogene. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for immunohistochemical testing was established to assess and improve the quality of HER2 immunohistochemical testing. However, until recently, no provision was available for HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) testing. A pilot scheme was set up to review the performance of FISH testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Methods: FISH was performed in 6 reference and 31 participating laboratories using a cell line panel with known HER2 status.

Results: Using results from reference laboratories as a criterion for acceptable performance, 60% of all results returned by participants were appropriate and 78% either appropriate or acceptable. However, 22.4% of results returned were deemed inappropriate, including 13 cases (4.2%) where a misdiagnosis would have been made had these been clinical specimens.

Conclusions: The results of three consecutive runs show that both reference laboratories and a proportion of routine clinical diagnostic (about 25%) centres can consistently achieve acceptable quality control of HER2 testing. Data from a significant proportion of participating laboratories show that further steps are required, including those taken via review of performance under schemes such as NEQAS, to improve quality of HER2 testing by FISH in the “real world”.

  • FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation
  • NEQAS, National External Quality Assessment Scheme
  • HER2/erbB-2
  • FISH/in situ hybridisation
  • fluorescence
  • herceptin
  • trastuzumab
  • quality assurance

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 8 September 2006

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.