You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 61, Issue 1
  • Comparing subjective and digital image analysis HER2/neu expression scores with conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Comparing subjective and digital image analysis HER2/neu expression scores with conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer
  1. I Skaland1,
  2. I Øvestad1,
  3. E A M Janssen1,
  4. J Klos1,
  5. K H Kjellevold1,
  6. T Helliesen1,
  7. J P A Baak1,2,3
  1. 1
    Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
  2. 2
    Department of Pathology, The Gade Institute, University of Bergen, Norway
  3. 3
    Department of Pathology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Professordr J P A Baak, Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, 4068 Stavanger, Norway; baja{at}sus.no

Abstract

Background: HER2/neu expression and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) amplification have therapeutic significance.

Aims: To compare subjective HER2/neu expression scores with digital image analysis (DIA) and conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer.

Methods: Sixty HercepTest-immunostained breast carcinomas, prospectively scored as consensus 2+ and 3+ (DAKO protocol) by two observers, were analysed with DIA, and conventional (Vysis) and modified FISH scoring protocols.

Results: With consensus scoring, 23 (38%) of the 60 cases were 2+ and 37 (62%) were 3+. Agreement with DIA scores was 100%. With conventional FISH scoring, 4 of the 3+ cases did not show amplification, but all of those negative cases had high HER2/neu copy numbers. With the modified FISH scoring protocol, all HercepTest immunohistochemical 3+ cases were amplified. Of the 2+ cases, 3 were amplified with the modified FISH protocol and 4 with the conventional FISH protocol.

Conclusions: Modified FISH scores were better correlated with HercepTest 3+ consensus and DIA scores than were conventional FISH scores. HER2/neu DIA scoring is a cost-effective supplementary tool in surgical pathology.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2007.046763

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None.