Article Text

PDF
Inflammatory bowel disease unclassified and indeterminate colitis: the role of the pathologist
  1. K Geboes,
  2. P Van Eyken
  1. Department of Pathology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  1. Dr K Geboes, Department of Pathology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 12, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; karel.geboes{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be

Abstract

Analysis of multiple biopsies allows a correct diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases in 66–75% of newly diagnosed patients. Additional endoscopic and clinical data allow a final diagnosis in more than 90%. Errors or lack of diagnosis are more frequent (up to 7%) in patients with severe inflammatory activity. The terminology for cases without a definite diagnosis is unclear. “Unclassified” and “uncertain” colitis have been proposed as well as “indeterminate colitis”. The latter term has become widely used but with a variety of definitions. The common feature of all definitions is that the aetiology and type of colitis can not be identified properly. Pathologists stress the need for colectomy specimens for the diagnosis, while paediatricians, surgeons and gastroenterologists stress the fact that the colitis can not be classified irrespective of the diagnostic tools used. A correct diagnosis is however essential for treatment. For the pathologist who has to provide such a diagnosis, it is important to know the normal histology and the features associated with various forms of colitis and clinical conditions. This paper describes an algorithm for a diagnosis of colitis with a focus on indeterminate colitis.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.