Article Text

PDF
Best practice: gross examination and sampling of surgical specimens from the urinary bladder
  1. Ashish Chandra1,
  2. David Griffiths2,
  3. Lorna J McWilliam3
  1. 1Cellular Pathology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3Department of Histopathology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ashish Chandra, Cellular Pathology, St Thomas' Hospital, Floor 2 North Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK; ashish.chandra{at}gstt.nhs.uk

Abstract

This review examines aspects of handling biopsies and surgical specimens from the urinary bladder with the aim of providing guidance to ensure that the pathologist is fully able to inform clinicians of all relevant factors that might have bearing on management or prognosis. It also offers recommendations on good practice in reporting in the setting of the specialist multidisciplinary meeting and emphasises quality control of the process, referring to recently published guidelines and consensuses while admitting that many of the recommendations may not be supported by a strong evidence base. The role of urine cytology and the value of frozen sections in urological practice are discussed. Participation in regular clinical audit and the national urological pathology External Quality Assurance (EQA) are recommended.

  • Bladder
  • uropathology
  • EQA
  • cancer
  • quality assurance
  • uropathology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.