rss
J Clin Pathol 65:228-231 doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200344
  • Original article

Clinicopathological and molecular study of penile melanoma

  1. N A C S Wong6
  1. 1Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
  2. 2Department of Histopathology, St George's Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  4. 4Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK
  5. 5Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
  6. 6Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jon Oxley, Consultant in Cellular Pathology, Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; jon.oxley{at}nbt.nhs.uk
  1. Contributors All the authors were involved in conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published.

  • Accepted 26 September 2011
  • Published Online First 19 October 2011

Abstract

Aims To examine the clinicopathological features of a series of penile melanomas and screen for mutations in the BRAF and KIT genes, which are seen in melanomas from other sites.

Methods and results 12 patients with penile melanoma were identified over a 10-year period in two supra-regional networks in the UK. The 2- and 5-year survival was 61% and 20%, respectively. Half the patients had lymph node involvement at presentation; this was a poor prognostic indicator. KIT exons 11, 13, 17 and 18, and BRAF codons 600 and 601 were analysed for mutations by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing, respectively. None of the tumours showed either KIT mutations or the BRAF V600E mutation.

Conclusion Penile melanomas are extremely rare and have a similar prognosis to melanomas elsewhere, but they often present late, leading to a poor outcome. The mutations seen in melanomas from other sites appear to be rarely present in these tumours.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by North Bristol NHS Trust.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Latest Pathology jobs

    Latest Pathology jobs