N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) has been well characterised to act as a metastatic suppressor in a number of human cancers. It has also been implicated to have a significant function in a number of physiological processes such as cellular differentiation and cell cycle. In this review, we discuss the role of NDRG1 in cancer pathology. NDRG1 was observed to be downregulated in the majority of cancers. Moreover, the expression of NDRG1 was found to be significantly lower in neoplastic tissues as compared with normal tissues. The most important function of NDRG1 in inhibiting tumour progression is associated with its ability to suppress metastasis. However, it has also been shown to have important effects on other stages of cancer progression (primary tumour growth and angiogenesis). Recently, novel iron chelators with selective antitumour activity (ie, Dp44mT, DpC) were shown to upregulate NDRG1 in cancer cells. Moreover, Dp44mT showed its antimetastatic potential only in cells expressing NDRG1, making this protein an important therapeutic target for cancer chemotherapy. This observation has led to increased interest in the examination of these novel anticancer agents.
- CANCER RESEARCH
Statistics from Altmetric.com
N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) (also known as Drg1, RTP, Rit42, PROXY-1 or Cap43) has been well described as a metastasis suppressor in a number of cancers including colon, prostate and breast cancers.1–3 The NDRG1 gene is a member of the human NDRG family, which also comprises NDRG2, NDRG3 and NDRG4.4–7 Chromosome mapping studies have demonstrated that the NDRG1 gene is located on chromosome eight and encodes a 3 kb mRNA that is translated into a 43 kDa protein.1 ,4 ,8 ,9 The NDRG family of proteins belongs to the α/β hydrolase group of enzymes, although it is notable that the NDRG1 protein lacks a hydrolytic catalytic site and is deficient in hydrolytic enzyme activity.10–12 This observation suggests that the gene has been modified by convergent evolution to obtain the same fold for a specific purpose.
NDRG1 is a phosphorylated protein that contains five calmodulin kinase 2 phosphorylation sites, three serine phosphorylation sites, a casein kinase II site, five myristoylation sites, three protein kinase C phosphorylation sites, one thioesterase site, one tyrosine phosphorylation site and one phosphopantotheine attachment site.13 Furthermore, NDRG1 has been shown to be phosphorylated by upstream kinases like serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (which are essential Ser/Thr kinase family proteins).14 The role of phosphorylation at numerous sites on the NDRG1 protein is still unknown, but may be related to the numerous physiological functions of NDRG1.15 The N-terminus of NDRG1 protein consists of two myc boxes (MBI and MBII), which are crucial for the protein's function, while the central region consists of MBIII (involved in cell transformation and apoptosis) and MBIV (for apoptosis induction, transformation and G2 arrest).16–18
Of interest, NDRG1 cDNA contains multiple CpG islands at its 5′ end, suggesting that DNA methylation can control NDRG1 expression.19 The NDRG1 gene has three hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) binding sites, with one situated in its promoter and the remaining two in its 3′ untranslated region,20 indicating that NDRG1 may be regulated by HIF-1 through its binding sites in the untranslated region.21
Distribution of NDRG1 in cells and tissues
The expression of NDRG1 mRNA is ubiquitous among human tissues, but higher levels are found in the prostate, brain, kidney, placenta and intestinal tissues.1 ,4 However, the NDRG1 protein is mainly found in the epithelium, which suggests that it may have a specific function related to these types of cells.22
At the cellular level, the NDRG1 protein is predominantly cytoplasmic in nature.22 However, this localisation can vary between different cell types (eg, intestinal and breast epithelia express membrane-associated protein, whereas prostate epithelial cells demonstrate nuclear localisation of NDRG122). In some cell types, mitochondrial localisation is also observed.22 Collectively, these findings suggest that NDRG1 functions in a tissue-specific manner.1 However, some studies have observed that NDRG1 distribution is not tissue-specific.4 ,23 Moreover, analysis using PSORTII software also predicts that NDRG1 is primarily a cytoplasmic protein (47.8%), followed by its localisation in the nucleus (26.1%) and mitochondrion (8.7%).
Membrane-associated NDRG1 protein has been mostly found adjacent to adherens junctions, where intermediate and microfilament bundles insert into these structures.22 This finding is suggestive of the involvement of NDRG1 in cell adhesion and this may be important for its ability to upregulate the levels of E-cadherin that plays a crucial role in forming the adherens complex.22
Function of NDRG1 and its regulation
NDRG1 and cellular differentiation
The exact function(s) of NDRG1 still remain elusive, but numerous recent studies have suggested that this molecule is involved in cellular differentiation (see figure 1).8 ,24 Using a variety of cell types, including keratinocytes, U937 myelomonocytic cells, colonic cancer cells, mast cells, renal cells, monocytes/macrophages and prostate cancer cells, revealed that differentiation positively correlated with increased NDRG1 expression induced by peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor γ.25–28 The role of NDRG1 in differentiation was further illustrated in experiments performed on rat peripheral glioma cells (D6P2T), which were induced to differentiate by the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethyl xanthine.29 This treatment resulted in a cessation of proliferation which coincided with a significant increase in NDRG1.29
Of interest, genes which are known to suppress cellular differentiation (eg, Hod, S100a10, connective tissue growth factor, ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 3 and secreted phosphoprotein 1) were shown to be downregulated by NDRG1, resulting in increased cellular differentiation.8 In addition, NDRG1 induces Wnt suppression which restores the epithelial cell–cell adhesion complex (E-cadherin-β-catenin).30 This is crucial for maintaining epithelial cell morphology, polarity and motility30 that is linked to a differentiated phenotype. The effect of NDRG1 on differentiation is probably linked to its effects on a variety of other molecular targets and these are described below.
NDRG1 and cell cycle control
Studies have noted that the expression of NDRG1 is biphasic throughout the cell cycle, peaking during the G1 and G2/M phases and decreasing to its lowest level during S phase.31 This finding indicates a potential role in G0/G1 arrest potentially through altered expression of p21WAF1/cip1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and 4.31 ,32 Interestingly, NDRG1 was found to upregulate p21WAF1/cip1 protein levels in prostate and lung cancer cells.33 However, NDRG1 expression had no effect on proliferation or the cell cycle of these latter cells; rather, it was able to inhibit cell migration.33 Potentially, this may indicate a cell type dependent response.
NDRG1 is also a microtubule-associated protein mainly located in centromeres that could be involved in p53-dependent spindle checkpoint and in mitosis.1 ,34 The main evidence for the role of NDRG1 in its role in the maintenance of euploidy is derived from studies performed using p53-negative cancer cell lines.35 When these cells were exposed to the microtubule inhibitor, taxol, NDRG1 expression was induced and the population of cells in M phase of the cell cycle was increased.35
Notably, phosphorylated NDRG1 has been found at the ends of microtubule bundles during late telophase.36 This observation suggests that NDRG1 could be involved in the attachment of mitotic spindles at the point of abscission, as well as cytokinesis regulation.36 Overexpression of NDRG1 has also been demonstrated to decrease expression of the Wnt-responsive gene, cyclin D1, which would inhibit cell cycle progression.37 In summary, NDRG1 appears to have a variety of effects on cell cycle control molecules that appear in some cases to be cell type-dependent.
NDRG1 and the stress response
High levels of NDRG1 usually reflect exposure of cells to conditions inducing stress.32 Expression of NDRG1 is induced by a range of stress inducing stimuli such as hypoxia, homocysteine, nickel, androgens, calcium and iron depletion.38–40 Hypoxia is an essential factor in solid tumour formation and is known to induce the generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species.41 It also activates HIF-1α, EGR1, nuclear factor-κB and other transcription factors involved in tumour angiogenesis and invasion.41–43 The HIF-1 transcription factor permits quick adaptation and survival when cells are exposed to reduced oxygen concentrations44 and plays an essential role in regulating hypoxia-responsive genes including NDRG1 (see figure 1).6 ,45 ,46 Studies have shown that NDRG1 upregulation can occur via HIF-1α-dependent and -independent mechanisms.46–48 In addition, NDRG1 was demonstrated to be regulated by Erg-1 under hypoxic conditions.42
Eukaryotic initiation factor 3a (eIF3a) is believed to be a constituent of stress granules, which are intracellular complexes formed on exposure to stressors such as hypoxia and oxidative stress.49 These granules act as triage centres, which selectively allow translation of proteins essential for the stress response.50 A recent study has shown that eIF3a positively regulated the expression of NDRG1 under iron-depleted conditions.40 This again re-emphasises the role of NDRG1 as an important stress response protein.
NDRG1 and PTEN
The NDRG1 protein is involved in regulating the negative feedback-loop linking the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway and the tumour suppressor, phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN).26 This observation was first noted in prostate cancer cells where PTEN expression is often lost due to low NDRG1 levels, which results in increased disease progression.26 In fact, when PTEN levels were upregulated in prostate and breast cancer cells, NDRG1 expression was also increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner.51 On the other hand, inhibiting PTEN expression using siRNA led to a reduction in NDRG1 levels.51 Interestingly, recent studies demonstrated that NDRG1 can also upregulate PTEN protein levels in pancreatic cancer cells.26 Hence, these latter molecules positively regulate each other.
In cancer cells, the balance in the PI3K/PTEN feedback-loop is frequently lost, which leads to increased PI3K signalling and reduced PTEN levels.26 This feedback-loop can be rebalanced by upregulating NDRG1, which subsequently increases PTEN expression, leading to inhibition of PI3K signalling and phosphorylated protein kinase B (pAKT), halting tumour progression.26 ,52
NDRG1 and p53
The tumour suppressor gene, p53, which induces NDRG1 in a cell type-specific manner, may control cell proliferation, caspase activation and apoptosis (see figure 1).38 ,39 Activation of NDRG1 occurs as a result of p53 binding to its promoter.38 This was revealed in the colon cancer cell line (DLD-1), where NDRG1 was upregulated after p53 induction.38 It was also shown that the expression of NDRG1 is induced by DNA damaging agents in a process which is dependent on p53.1 ,38 Moreover, it was also observed that NDRG1 was required for the induction of p53-mediated apoptosis in the colon cancer cell line, DLD-1.38 Conversely, other studies involving lung cancer cell lines have shown a lack of correlation between NDRG1 expression and DNA damage even though p53 is upregulated.29 ,46 These observations potentially indicate cell- and tissue-specific regulation of NDRG1 via p53.
In addition, EGR1 can upregulate p53 which can, in turn, positively regulate both p21WAF1/cip1 and NDRG1.12 ,52–54 Moreover, as mentioned earlier, NDRG1 itself can also upregulate p21WAF1/cip1.33 Subsequently, p21WAF1/cip1 inhibits cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis by inducing G1/S arrest.33 ,55 This latter molecule can also inhibit cell migration and metastasis of cancers.33
NDRG1 and MYC
Overexpression of N-myc and c-myc genes represses NDRG1 expression by binding to the N-myc binding motif close to the initiation promoter (see figure 1).29 ,56 This was shown in mice where the mouse homologue of NDRG1 (Ndr-1) was transcriptionally repressed by the N-myc:Max heterodimer, which binds to the Ndr-1 promoter region.57 Moreover, in IMR-32 and NGP neuroblastoma cells, N-myc suppression by retinoids promoted NDRG1 expression.29 As a result, retinoids can induce cellular differentiation, which could increase NDRG1 levels by other pathways.29 Interestingly, nickel upregulates NDRG1 in some cell types and also inhibits N-myc expression.29
Role of NDRG1 in primary tumour growth, metastasis and angiogenesis
It is notable that NDRG1 is widely expressed in normal cells and tissues.22 In contrast, NDRG1 was observed to be downregulated in the majority of cancers.2 A range of prostate cancer specimens analysed by immunohistochemistry have shown that NDRG1 expression is lower in neoplastic when compared with adjacent normal tissues.19 This finding was further substantiated by the discovery of an inverse relationship between the Gleason grade of the cancer with NDRG1 expression levels, where a higher grade corresponds to poorly differentiated tumours with low NDRG1 protein expression.58 ,59 This finding is also observed in colon cancer where the expression of NDRG1 declines as normal colonic epithelium progresses to carcinoma.60 The decline in NDRG1 expression was revealed to correlate with a shorter 5-year survival rate in colonic cancer patients.60
Role of NDRG1 in primary tumour growth
The NDRG1 protein has a significant role in inhibiting primary tumour growth. Increased expression of NDRG1 resulted in a reduction in tumour microvascular density, invasion depth and histopathological grading.61 This molecule also reduced proliferation rates in bladder cancer cell lines by up to 70%.62 The primary growth of the human breast, prostate and bladder cancer cell lines was inhibited by NDRG1, leading to suppression of anchorage-independent growth in soft agar.24 In contrast, other studies have shown that NDRG1 overexpression had no effect on pancreatic cancer cell growth in vitro, as well as in colon and prostate tumours.19 ,63 In addition, no correlation was observed between size or histological grade of breast cancer and NDRG1 expression.51
Role of NDRG1 as a metastasis suppressor
The NDRG1 gene is likely to be involved in metastasis suppression due to its negative association with tumour metastasis and cell migration.64–67 In fact, in vivo studies demonstrated that NDRG1 significantly inhibited the metastasis of rat prostate cancer AT6.1 cells to the lungs.19 Further studies subsequently demonstrated that NDRG1 inhibited metastasis by reducing cell–matrix and cell–cell adhesion in the AT6.1 cells in vitro.8 Interestingly, in an investigation using breast cancer cells, upregulation of E-cadherin by NDRG1 reduced the motility of these cells (see figure 1).63 These studies suggested that NDRG1 modulates important adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin to inhibit metastasis. These early observations were further confirmed by studies demonstrating a significant increase in the adherens junction proteins E-cadherin and β-catenin at the plasma membrane in response to NDRG1 overexpression.37 In fact, while transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) reduced E-cadherin and β-catenin levels in these DU-145 prostate and HCT116 colon cancer cells, NDRG1 was able to significantly inhibit this effect.37 On the other hand, silencing NDRG1 using siRNA in these cells led to a marked reduction in E-cadherin and β-catenin membrane levels.37 Moreover, NDRG1 overexpression also markedly inhibited cell migration and invasion in these cells in vitro.37 Hence, NDRG1 promotes the formation of the adherens junctions, leading to increased cell–cell adhesion and reduced cell migration and invasion, resulting in reduced metastatic potential.
Interestingly, the NDRG1 protein is involved in different roles in metastatic and non-metastatic cells.4 ,39 NDRG1 expression inhibited cell proliferation in metastatic (H1299-NDRG1) cell line, but had no effect in non-metastatic (DLD-1-NDRG1) cells.38 In human prostate cancer cells, NDRG1 expression levels were much higher in organ-confined tumours than in lymph node or bone metastases.19 Thus, NDRG1 can be used as a molecular biological marker for tumour prognosis.6 ,65 This was confirmed in studies showing that NDRG1 may predict early invasion, metastasis and detect hypoxic regions within the tumour mass of gastric cancer cells, as well as determining patient prognosis.6 ,65
In metastatic cancer cells, actin is polymerised to form stress fibres which help in cellular migration and metastasis.68 It has been shown that phosphorylation of myosin light chain 2 (pMLC2) by ROCK1 has an important role in the formation of stress fibres (see figure 2).69 In a recent study, it has been shown that NDRG1 can inhibit the ROCK1/pMLC2 pathway, leading to suppression of stress fibre assembly and rearrangement. This acts as an additional pathway via which NDRG1 can modulate its antimetastatic effects.70
Role of NDRG1 in angiogenesis
The NDRG1 gene has an important role in regulating angiogenesis (see figure 1).67 Interestingly, the mRNA levels of the two angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-1) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), were reduced in cells when NDRG1 was overexpressed.61 Pancreatic cancer cells with high NDRG1 levels had a significant reduction in both VEGF-1 and IL-8 protein, as well as reduced matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity which leads to modulation of angiogenesis.71–73 In addition, NDRG1 expression was negatively correlated to tumour microvascular density via inhibition of nuclear factor-κB, chemokines and VEGF-A.74 Conversely, other studies demonstrate that in cervical cancer patients the enhanced tumour expression of NDRG1 correlated with a higher tumour microvessel density.24 These differences could again reflect the tissue-specific function of NDRG1.
Targeting NDRG1 as a novel antimetastatic therapy
The expression of NDRG1 can be markedly increased in multiple cancer types in vitro and in vivo by novel anticancer agents, namely, the thiosemicarbazone iron chelators of the di-2-pyridylketone thiosemicarbazone class, di-2-pyridylketone 4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (Dp44mT) and di-2-pyridylketone 4-cyclohexyl-4-methyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (DpC; figure 3A).33 ,37 ,46 These compounds are unique new generation ligands that unlike typical chelators (eg, desferrioxamine, deferisirox, deferiprone; figure 3B) do not induce whole body iron depletion at optimal doses.75–77 In fact, the mechanism of action of these ligands involves the binding of iron and/or copper and the formation of a redox active complex that generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species.78–80 This dual activity of these agents has been termed the ‘double punch’ as they deplete cells of iron that is critical for proliferation, while at the same time forming a redox-active iron/copper complexes that damages cancer cell lysosomes and this induces apoptosis and cell death (figure 3C).78–80
Targeting iron in cancer cells is a novel approach to the treatment of this disease. Indeed, iron is an essential element that is necessary for cell proliferation.81 Moreover, cancer cells, which proliferate rapidly, have higher requirements for iron than normal cells.82 This is reflected by the increased expression of the transferrin receptor 1 on cancer cells, which is the primary mechanism of iron uptake.82 ,83 Iron is also a critical requirement for many signalling cascades, such as HIF-1α,84 JNK/P38/MAPK,84 p53/p21/Cyclin D184 and Wnt/β-catenin.85 Hence, considering their diverse molecular targets, iron chelators may be a promising new therapeutic approach to reverse or prevent cancer metastasis.
The novel iron chelator, Dp44mT, was able to maintain the expression of epithelial markers, E-cadherin and β-catenin, attenuating the TGF-β-induced epithelial to mesemchymal transition in prostate and colorectal cancer cells.37 Moreover, this effect was mediated via NDRG1 upregulation and subsequent inhibition of the SMAD/Snail and Wnt pathways (see figure 2).37 Furthermore, in our studies, we demonstrate that both Dp44mT and DpC inhibit ROCK1/pMLC2-modulated actin-filament polymerisation, stress fibre assembly and formation via a mechanism involving NDRG1 activation (see figure 2).70 A recent study showed marked suppression in metastasis upon treatment with Dp44mT in vivo.30 Furthermore, these investigators observed a significant reduction in the ability of Dp44mT to inhibit metastasis in xenografts of NDRG1-knockdown MDA-MB-231-BoM cells, demonstrating the importance of NDRG1 as a therapeutic target in Dp44mT-mediated metastasis suppression.30 These results highlight the potential of novel iron chelators as inhibitors of cancer metastasis in tumours that are regulated by NDGR1.
NDRG1 has been shown to play an important role in both physiological as well as pathophysiological conditions. It plays a critical role in cancer progression, mainly due to its inhibitory effects on cancer metastasis, via its interaction with key signalling pathways, such as PI3K and WNT. Moreover, novel iron chelators (ie, DpC) have shown to upregulate NDRG1 and have been demonstrated to have potent antitumour activity. This has led to an interest in the use of these novel ligands as potential chemotherapeutics. In conclusion, further elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the antimetastatic effects of NDRG1 will facilitate the development of new therapies for inhibiting cancer metastasis.
NDRG1 has important function in cancer pathology, mainly by its ability to inhibit metastasis.
Novel iron chelators (DpC, Dp44mT) can upregulate NDRG1expression via hypoxia inducible factor-1α-dependent and independent mechanisms.
NDRG1 is required for the anti-metastatic activity of Dp44mT.
Novel iron chelators have shown the potential to be developed as chemotherapeutics against metastatic cancers.
DRR thanks the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) for a Senior Principal Research Fellowship and Project Grant funding. DSK appreciates NHMRC Project Grant support. PJJ and ZK kindly acknowledge the NHMRC, Cancer Institute of New South Wales (CINSW) and/or Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia for Early Career Research Fellowships.
SS and DRR contributed equally to the work as co-corresponding and senior authors.
Contributors All authors contributed to design, writing and presentation of the review.
Funding NHMRC, Australia.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.