Article Text

PDF
In the era of the 24 h laboratory, does communicating Gram stain results from blood cultures flagging positive outside of conventional working hours alter patient management?
  1. Jonathan S Moore,
  2. Roland J Koerner
  1. Microbiology Department, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jonathan S Moore, Microbiology Department, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK; Jonathan.Moore2{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Aims As laboratories move towards 24 h a day working patterns, we aim to evaluate if expediting the availability of provisional blood culture results outside of normal working hours would derive clinical benefit.

Methods 116 blood cultures flagging positive outside of conventional working hours (20:00–09:00) were studied. In each case, medical records were reviewed and cases discussed with clinicians to determine if earlier communication of results would have altered management and affected the outcome.

Results Organisms were seen in 102/116 blood cultures. In total, 76/82 (92.7%) patients with cultures deemed to be significant were on an antibiotic. The isolate was sensitive to the prescribed antibiotic in 56/74 (76%) cases. Input from a microbiologist is likely to have altered management in 14 (13.7%) cases, but unlikely to have affected any outcomes.

Conclusions We found no compelling evidence that expediting the availability of Gram stain results from positive blood cultures alone improves patient outcome.

  • BACTERAEMIA
  • BLOOD CULTURE
  • MICROBIOLOGY

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.