Article Text

other Versions

PDF
My approach to Indeterminate Colitis: The role of the Pathologist
  1. Karel Geboes (karel.geboes{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be)
  1. University Hospital KU Leuven, Belgium

    Abstract

    Analysis of multiple biopsies allows a correct diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in 66 – 75% of newly diagnosed patients. Additional endoscopic and clinical data allow a final diagnosis in more than 90%.(1, 2) Errors or lack of diagnosis are more frequent (up to 7%) in patients with severe inflammatory activity.(2) The terminology for cases without a definite diagnosis is unclear. “Unclassified” and “uncertain” colitis have been proposed as well as “indeterminate colitis (IC)”.(3, 4) The latter term has become widely used but with a variety of definitions.(5) The common feature of all definitions is that the aetiology and type of colitis can not be identified properly. Pathologists stress the need for colectomy specimens for the diagnosis, while paediatricians, surgeons and gastroenterologists stress the fact that the colitis can not be classified irrespective of the diagnostic tools used. A correct diagnosis is however essential for treatment. For the pathologist who has to provide such a diagnosis, it is important to know the normal histology and the features associated with various forms of colitis and clinical conditions. This paper describes an algorithm for a diagnosis of colitis with a focus on IC.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.