Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Which staging system to use for gynaecological cancers: a survey with recommendations for practice in the UK
  1. W Glenn McCluggage1,
  2. Lynn Hirschowitz2,
  3. Raji Ganesan2,
  4. Sean Kehoe3,
  5. Andrew Nordin4
  1. 1Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Belfast, UK
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3Department of Gynaecological Oncology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  4. 4Department of Gynaecological Oncology, East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Margate, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor W Glenn McCluggage, Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK; glenn.mccluggage{at}belfasttrust.hscni.net

Abstract

Aims There are two commonly used staging systems for gynaecological cancers, namely Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) and TNM. The authors wished to ascertain which staging system is most commonly used in dealing with gynaecological cancers in the UK.

Methods The authors undertook a survey among participants in the National Gynaecological Pathology EQA scheme to investigate whether gynaecological pathologists in the UK use FIGO or TNM staging in their routine reporting of gynaecological cancers.

Results There were 105 respondents out of 278 participants (38%). Of the analysed results, a majority of respondents (64%) use FIGO staging, while 32% use both FIGO and TNM. 80% of respondents stated that their multidisciplinary team meeting uses FIGO staging, while 18% use both FIGO and TNM. Only an extremely small minority of pathologists and multidisciplinary team meetings use TNM alone. A survey of members of the British Gynaecological Cancer Society revealed similar findings.

Conclusions Since FIGO and TNM are not always equivalent, and there may be confusion when more than one staging system is used, it is recommended that FIGO staging be used for gynaecological cancers. The survey revealed support for the use of TNM, as well as FIGO, only for cervical cancer, since FIGO does not take the lymph node status into account. Given the prevalent practice in the UK, the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists, British Gynaecological Cancer Society and gynaecological clinical reference group of the National Cancer Intelligence Network recommend that FIGO staging be used for gynaecological cancers with recording of the lymph node status for cervical cancer. This may be done by providing a TNM stage for this cancer type only or by recording the lymph-node status at the multidisciplinary team meeting.

  • Gynaecological cancer
  • FIGO
  • TNM
  • gynaecological pathology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.