Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Ten problematical issues identified by pathology review for multidisciplinary gynaecological oncology meetings
  1. W Glenn McCluggage
  1. Correspondence to Professor W Glenn McCluggage, Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, UK; glenn.mccluggage{at}belfasttrust.hscni.net

Abstract

Pathology review of gynaecological cancer specimens is often carried out as part of the working of gynaecological oncology multidisciplinary team meetings. This review describes the author's experience regarding the most common issues identified during this process. Ten subjects are covered; these range from histopathological interpretational errors to non-interpretational areas, for example, inappropriate use of the term ‘microinvasive cervical carcinoma’ and the use of inappropriate staging systems. This review is intended to be of practical use to the surgical pathologist reporting gynaecological cancer specimens.

  • cervix
  • colorectal cancer
  • endometrium
  • gall bladder
  • gynaecological oncology
  • histopathology
  • multidisciplinary team meeting
  • neoplasms
  • oncogenes
  • ovary
  • pancreas
  • pathology review
  • p53
  • uterus

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.