rss
J Clin Pathol doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200625
  • Original article

Enhanced biomedical scientist cut-up role in colonic cancer reporting

  1. Emma Simmons
  1. Coventry and Warwickshire Pathology Service, Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Warwick, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Scott A Sanders, Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Lakin Road, Warwick CV34 5BJ, UK; scott.sanders{at}swh.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 14 December 2011
  • Published Online First 12 March 2012

Abstract

Aims To extend the biomedical scientist (BMS) cut-up role to include gastrointestinal category D colorectal cancer resection specimens, and to address issues of quality and safety by presenting performance data from the first 50 BMS cut-up specimens in comparison with national guidelines and pathologist performance over the same timeframe.

Methods Close mentoring and consultant supervision was carried out for every case with adherence to standard operating procedures and following colorectal cancer dataset guidelines as published by the Royal College of Pathologists. Performance targets were audited including anticipated spread of Dukes' stage, targets for mean lymph node harvest, percentage extramural vascular invasion and serosal involvement, and mean tumour blocks sampled. Histological pre-reporting of 20 cases was encouraged, and time spent by BMS and consultant at all stages of specimen reporting was noted.

Results Performance targets were all exceeded by the BMS and compared favourably with pathologist performance. A measure of consultant cut-up and histology reporting time saved was identified.

Conclusions Benefits of extending the BMS role to category D specimens may include BMS professional advancement, efficient use of consultant time and the development of a team approach to cancer reporting. The achievement of colorectal cancer performance targets and favourable comparison with pathologist performance implies there was no perceived detrimental effect on quality or safety and thus patient management.

Footnotes

  • Main collaborators Dr Peter Hawker, Dr Jeremy Shearman, Dr Bernard Usselmann, Dr Ali Naji, Dr Lisa Gladman, Mr Paul Murphy, Miss Karen Busby, Mr James Francombe, Mr Mike Stellakis, Mr Martin Osborne, Dr Rakesh Sinha.

  • Competing interests None to declare.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Responses to this article


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article