Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Topoisomerase II alpha amplification may predict benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in HER2 positive early breast cancer

  • Preclinical Study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

TOP2A gene encodes topoisomerase II alpha, the direct molecular target of anthracyclines. This gene is frequently coamplified with HER2. The aims of this study were to analyse the pattern of TOP2A amplification and protein expression in relation to the molecular subgroups of breast cancers; and to define the impact of TOP2A amplification on the outcome of a series of patients homogeneously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines.

Methods

A cohort of 245 patients with early breast cancer homogeneously treated with anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting was selected. A tissue microarray containing these cancers was used to determine HER2 and TOP2A gene copy number by means of chromogenic in situ hybridization. Immunohistochemical staining of topoisomerase II alpha was also performed using a monoclonal antibody (Ki-S1). TOP2A amplification and protein expression were correlated with classical prognostic parameters, expression of immunohistochemical markers and with a gene expression profiling classification using surrogate immunohistochemical markers. Kaplan–Meier method was used to construct survival curves and results were compared with log-rank test.

Results

TOP2A amplification was restricted to tumours with HER2 amplification and was significantly associated with ER positivity. In the subgroup of patients with HER2 amplified tumours, TOP2A amplification predicted a better overall survival and disease free survival (P = 0.028 and 0.026, respectively). On multivariate analysis, TOP2A amplification maintained its predictive value for DFS.

Conclusion

TOP2A amplification is likely to be a useful marker to predict the subset of patients who will benefit from anthracyclines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8418–8423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reis-Filho JS, Westbury C, Pierga JY (2006) The impact of expression profiling on prognostic and predictive testing in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 59:225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenton JD, Carey LA, Ahmed AA et al (2005) Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? J Clin Oncol 23:7350–7360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dowsett M, Houghton J, Iden C et al (2006) Benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients according oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, EGF receptor and HER2 status. Ann Oncol 17:818–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 352:930–942

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin M, Villar A, Sole-Calvo A et al (2003) Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group. Ann Oncol 14:833–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shan K, Lincoff AM, Young JB (1996) Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Ann Intern Med 125:47–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matesich SM, Shapiro CL (2003) Second cancers after breast cancer treatment. Semin Oncol 30:740–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mistry AR, Felix CA, Whitmarsh RJ et al (2005) DNA topoisomerase II in therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 352:1529–1538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones RL, Swanton C, Ewer M (2006) Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Expert Opinion Drug Safety 5:791–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Muss HB, Thor AD, Berry DA et al (1994) c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 330:1260–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik S, Bryant J, Park C et al (1998) erbB-2 and response to doxorubicin in patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1361–1370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thor AD, Berry DA, Budman DR et al (1998) erbB-2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1346–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E et al (2005) Retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 23:7483–7490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanner M, Isola J, Wiklund T et al (2006) Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification predicts favorable treatment response to tailored and dose-escalated anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2/neu-amplified breast cancer: Scandinavian Breast Group Trial 9401. J Clin Oncol 24:2428–2436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang JC (1996) DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biochem 65:635–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jarvinen TA, Tanner M, Barlund M et al (1999) Characterization of topoisomerase II alpha gene amplification and deletion in breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 26:142–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarvinen TA, Tanner M, Rantanen V et al (2000) Amplification and deletion of topoisomerase IIalpha associate with ErbB-2 amplification and affect sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin in breast cancer. Am J Pathol 156:839–847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coon JS, Marcus E, Gupta-Burt S et al (2002) Amplification and overexpression of topoisomerase IIalpha predict response to anthracycline-based therapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 8:1061–1067

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Leo A, Chan S, Paesmans M et al (2004) HER-2/neu as a predictive marker in a population of advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated either with single-agent doxorubicin or single-agent docetaxel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86:197–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Leo A, Gancberg D, Larsimont D et al (2002) HER-2 amplification and topoisomerase IIalpha gene aberrations as predictive markers in node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with an anthracycline-based therapy or with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil. Clin Cancer Res 8:1107–1116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park K, Kim J, Lim S et al (2003) Topoisomerase II-alpha (topoII) and HER2 amplification in breast cancers and response to preoperative doxorubicin chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 39:631–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petit T, Wilt M, Velten M et al (2004) Comparative value of tumour grade, hormonal receptors, Ki-67, HER-2 and topoisomerase II alpha status as predictive markers in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 40:205–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arriola E, Moreno A, Varela M et al (2006) Predictive value of HER-2 and Topoisomerase IIalpha in response to primary doxorubicin in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 42:2954–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hannemann J, Kristel P, van Tinteren H et al (2006) Molecular subtypes of breast cancer and amplification of topoisomerase IIalpha: predictive role in dose intensive adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 95:1334–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10:5367–5374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reis-Filho JS, Steele D, Di Palma S et al (2006) Distribution and significance of nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR/p75NTR) in normal, benign and malignant breast tissue. Mod Pathol 19:307–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ellis IO, Galea M, Broughton N et al (1992) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 20:479–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singletary SE, Connolly JL (2006) Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin 56:37–47 quiz 50–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanner M, Gancberg D, Di Leo A et al (2000) Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a practical alternative for fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival breast cancer samples. Am J Pathol 157:1467–1472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Bono P et al (2006) Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 354:809–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lambros MB, Simpson PT, Jones C et al (2006) Unlocking pathology archives for molecular genetic studies: a reliable method to generate probes for chromogenic and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Lab Invest 86:398–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Reis-Filho JS, Savage K, Lambros MB et al (2006) Cyclin D1 protein overexpression and CCND1 amplification in breast carcinomas: an immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridisation analysis. Mod Pathol 19:999–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Leo A, Larsimont D, Gancberg D et al (2001) HER-2 and topo-isomerase IIalpha as predictive markers in a population of node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated with adjuvant CMF or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Ann Oncol 12:1081–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pauletti G, Dandekar S, Rong H et al (2000) Assessment of methods for tissue-based detection of the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer: a direct comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 18:3651–1364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Burden DA, Osheroff N (1998) Mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and drugs targeted to the enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1400:139–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang JC (2002) Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:430–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Park K, Han S, Gwak GH et al (2006) Topoisomerase II-alpha gene deletion is not frequent as its amplification in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:337–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pierga JY, Leroyer A, Viehl P et al (1996) Long term prognostic value of growth fraction determination by Ki-67 immunostaining in primary operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37:57–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. MacGrogan G, Rudolph P, Mascarel Id I et al (2003) DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression and the response toprimary chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:666–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Depowski PL, Rosenthal SI, Brien TP et al (2000) Topoisomerase IIalpha expression in breast cancer: correlation with outcome variables. Mod Pathol 13:542–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rudolph P, Olsson H, Bonatz G, et al (1999) Correlation between p53, c-erbB-2, and topoisomerase II alpha expression, DNA ploidy, hormonal receptor status and proliferation in 356 node-negative breast carcinomas: prognostic implications. J Pathol 187:207–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Durbecq V, Paesmans M, Cardoso F et al (2004) Topoisomerase-II alpha expression as a predictive marker in a population of advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated either with single-agent doxorubicin or single-agent docetaxel. Mol Cancer Ther 3:1207–1214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Arpino G, Ciocca DR, Weiss H et al (2005) Predictive value of apoptosis, proliferation, HER-2, and topoisomerase IIalpha for anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 92:69–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Minisini AM, Di Loreto C, Mansutti M et al (2005) Topoisomerase IIalpha and APE/ref-1 are associated with pathologic response to primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Lett 224:133–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge S. Reis-Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arriola, E., Rodriguez-Pinilla, S.M., Lambros, M.B.K. et al. Topoisomerase II alpha amplification may predict benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in HER2 positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106, 181–189 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9492-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9492-5

Keywords

Navigation