Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 28, Issue 8, August 1997, Pages 967-973
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Reproducibility of histological subtype analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(97)90013-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Historically, two major strata of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been linked to outcome, the presence or absence of comedo type and size. Our initial approach in classification was dichotomous, often favoring the comedo type with most worrisome implications to foster agreement in diagnosis. We have now tested guidelines that foster agreement in the modified Lagios three-tiered system. Sixteen cases of DCIS were selected, reflecting a spectrum of histological subtypes, with specific inclusion of cases in which consensus in classification using a dichotomous (comedo/noncomedo) scheme would be difficult. Six independent observers reviewed a minimum of five color 35-mm slides from each case at two separate occasions. The aim was to subclassify each case based on architectural pattern, nuclear grade, and presence or absence of tumor necrosis (Modified Lagios Classification, Lagios et al, Cancer 1989). After initial review, emphasizing placement of each case into a high- or low-grade category, there was disagreement in seven cases (44%), confirming our aim to choose cases with uncertain cues for classification. Agreement was achieved in 94% of cases by allowing re-review with emphasis on inclusion of an intermediate-grade category. Our study also suggests that pure micropapillary DCIS and apocrine DCIS warrant independent classification as “special type” DCIS. Our small pilot study suggests that, with adherence to specific criteria, most DCIS cases can be easily and consistently classified into the following five categories: (1) high grade, (2) intermediate grade, (3) low grade, (4) pure or predominantly micropapillary, and (5) pure apocrine. Our six observers independently reached a final concordance of 94% despite selection of cases in which consensus in a dichotomous classification was difficult. This was achieved predominantly by accepting an intermediate category of DCIS with intermediate nuclear features and limited necrosis. Confirmation of the applicability of the Modified Lagios Classification awaits completion of a much larger multi-institutional study in which statistical significance and interobserver variation can be better defined.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (95)

  • Breast intraductal nanoformulations for treating ductal carcinoma in situ I: Exploring metal-ion complexation to slow ciclopirox release, enhance mammary persistence and efficacy

    2020, Journal of Controlled Release
    Citation Excerpt :

    DCIS lesions are classified as low, intermediate, or high grade based mostly on their nuclear grade and expression of Ki-67 [3]. The alteration in genetic expression for low-grade DCIS highly resembles that of atypical ductal hyperplasia, while the expression of the oncogenic pathway and molecular markers for high-grade DCIS are the same as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) [4,5]. The probability of progressing to invasive cancer after ten years in untreated patients is notably lower in low grade (16%) as compared to high grade DCIS (60%) [6,7].

  • In situ carcinomas of the breast: Ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ

    2018, The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases
  • Finding the balance between over- and under-treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

    2017, Breast
    Citation Excerpt :

    Reliability studies are hard to compare as they often differ in study design. Also they are limited due to: mostly examining a small number of highly selected cases [35,40–45]; being assessed by expert breast pathologists only and; often after being giving instructions or tutorials beforehand [35,41,42,45,46]. Translation of these findings into daily practice is therefore questionable and, so far, has not reduced inter-observer variability.

  • Imaging Features of Micropapillary DCIS: Correlation with Clinical and Histopathological Findings.

    2011, Academic Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The traditional classification of DCIS is into comedo and noncomedo (cribriform, micropapillary, and solid) subtypes. The micropapillary subtype of DCIS is associated with more extensive disease at diagnosis, irrespective of nuclear grade or presence of necrosis (3,4,12). To date, there are limited data on the imaging characteristics of the micropapillary subtype of DCIS.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented in part at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathologists Meeting, Toronto, Canada, March 1995.

View full text