Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Significance of pathological evaluation for lymphatic vessel invasion in invasive breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) has been conventionally assessed on hematoxylineosin (HE) stained sections, but this assessment tends to be subjective. The aim of this study is to investigate the significance of LVI in invasive breast cancers, primarily using immunohistochemical lymphatic endothelial markers.

Methods

We studied 69 invasive breast carcinoma cases. Using D2-40 and podoplanin, we investigated the distribution of lymphatic vessels around the tumor and LVI, and they were compared with the HE sections. The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis and disease free survival (DFS) was also investigated.

Results

Lymphatic vessels were most frequently seen outside the tumor (86%), whereas lymphatic vessels were not seen in the central zone of the tumor. LVI was found in 22 cases, of which nineteen was seen in the peripheral zone (87%). For both HE and lymphatic markers, the rates of mild LVI tended to be high. The concordance rate between D2-40 and podoplanin was 94.2% (65/69). LVI assessed on HE sections was corresponded to 54/69 cases (78.2%) using either D2-40 or podoplanin. There were 25 axillary lymph node positive cases. Lymph node metastasis significantly correlated with LVI assessed by HE section, but did not correlate with LVI assessed by the lymphatic markers. The tumor recurred in 19 cases during the mean follow-up period of 47.5 months. Disease free survival was significantly better for LVI negative cases on HE analysis, and LVI negative or mildly positive by any staining procedure.

Conclusion

The lymphatic endothelium markers, D2-40 and podoplanin, are very useful for detecting LVI, but careful examination by routine HE sections may be enough for routine practice. Moderate or marked degree of LVI may be of value to predict survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HE:

hematoxylin-eosin

LVI:

lymphatic vessel invasion

VEGF:

vascular endothelial growth factor

LVD:

lymph vessel density

References

  1. Cody HS 3rd, Borgen PI, Tan LK: Redefining prognosis in node-negative breast cancer: can sentinel lymph node biopsy raise the threshold for systemic adjuvant therapy?Ann Surg Oncol 11(3 Suppl): 227S-230S, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ: Panel members: Meeting highlights. International Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005.Ann of Oncology 16:1569–1583, 2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Galea M, O’Rouke S, Blarney RW, Elston CW: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up.Histopathology 24: 41–47, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kato T, Kameoka S, Kimura T, Nishikawa M, Kobayashi T: The combination of angiogenesis and blood vessel invasion as a prognostic indicator in primary breast cancer.Br J Cancer 88:1900–1908, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasebe T, Sasaki S, Imoto S, Ochiai A: Histological characteristics of tumor in vessels and lymph nodes are significant predictors of progression of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. A prospective study.Hum Pathol 35: 298–308, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoppmann SF, Bayer G, Aumayr K, Taucher S, Geleff S, Rudas M, Kubista E, Hausmaninger H, Samonigg H, Gnant M, Jakesz R, Horvat R: Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group: Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer.Ann Surg 240: 306–312, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Mascarel I, Bonichon F, Durand M, Mauriac L, MacGrogan G, Soubeyran I, Picot V, Avril A, Coindre JM, Trojani M: Obvious peritumoral emboli: an elusive prognostic factor reappraised. Multivariate analysis of 1320 node-negative breast cancers.Eur J Cancer 34: 58–65, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Agarwal B, Saxena R, Moriyama A, Mehrtra S, Bades S: Lymphangiogenesis does not occur in breast cancer.Am J Surg Pathol 29:1449–1455, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Imabun S, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Nakamura M, Mori I, Kakudo K: Lymph vessel density correlates with nodal status, VEGF-C expression and prognosis in breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:125–132, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chunnick GH, Jiang WG, Gomez KF, Mansel RE: Lymphangiogenesis and breast cancer metastasis.Histol Histopathol 17: 863–870, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng Y, Opeskin K, Horvath LG, Sutherland RL, Williams ED: Lymphatic vessel invasion and lymph node metastasis in prostatic cancer.Prostate 65: 222–230, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyzas PA, Geleff S, Batistatou A, Agnantis NJ, Stefanou D: Evidence of lymphangiogenesis and its prognostic implications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.J Pathol 206:170–177, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmid K, Birner P, Gravenhort V, End A, Geleff S: Prognostic value of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung.Am J Surg Pathol 29: 324–328, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schloppmann SF, Birner P, Studer P, BreitenederGeleff S: Lymphatic microvessel densitiy and lymphovascular invasion assessed by anti-podoplanin immunostaining in human breast cancer.Anticancer Res 21: 2351–2355, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Birner P, Obermair A, Schindl M, Kowalski H, Breitenecker G, Oberhber G: Selective immunohistochemical staining of blood and lymphatic vessels reveals independent prognostic influence of blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in early-stage cervical cancer.Clin Cancer Res 7: 93–97, 2001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Renyi-Vamos F, Tovari J, Filinger J, Timer J, Paku S, Kenessey T, Ostoros G, Agoes L, Soltesz I, Dame B: Lymphangiogenesis correlates with lymph node metastasis, prognosis, and angiogenic phenotype in human non-small cell lung cancer.Clin Cancer Res 11: 7344–7353, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Kurozumi K, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Kakudo K: Importance of lymph vessels in gastric cancer. A prognostic indicator in general and a predictor for lymph node metastasis in early stage cancer.J Clin Pathol 59: 77–82, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Elston EW, Ellis IO: Method for grading breast cancer.J Clin Pathol 46:189–190, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moriya T, Usami S, Tada H, Kasajima A, Ishida K, Kariya Y, Ohuchi N, Sasano H: Pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for breast cancer.Asian J Surg 27:256–261, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Evangelou E, Kyzas PA, Trikalinos TA: Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of lymphatic endothelial markers. Bayesian approach.Mod Pathol 18: 1490–1497, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishida T, Ohuchi N: The degree of the completion for of breast concerving surgery.J Clin Surg 57: 283–288, 2003. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Moriya.

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, M., Moriya, T., Ishida, T. et al. Significance of pathological evaluation for lymphatic vessel invasion in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer 14, 381–387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.14.381

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.14.381

Key words

Navigation