Table 1

Research ethics committee members were asked to indicate their opinion of each scenario on a scale of 1 (totally ethical) to 5 (totally unethical)

Ethical?
BlockQScenario descriptionYes??No
Full questions are available on JCP website (http://jcp.bmjjournals.com/supplemental/).
A1Screen for a serious condition (Down’s syndrome). No risk to unaffected fetus431121
2Screen for a serious condition: 1 unaffected fetus spontaneously aborted for every 2 affected fetuses diagnosed61060
3Screen for a serious condition: 2 unaffected fetuses spontaneously aborted for every 1 affected fetus diagnosed5269
B4Screen for red hair and freckles5368
5Screen for a life threatening condition to allow surgery/neonatal intensive care when the baby is born7322
C6Screen for reduction in life expectancy by 10 years4766
7Screen for reduction in life expectancy by 10 years—will need drug treatment9761
D8Screen for reduction in life expectancy by 50 years201839
9Screen for reduction in life expectancy by 50 years: a cure is likely in the next 15 years161843
E10Screen for slight lowering of education potential2372
11Screen for moderate lowering of education potential1670
12Screen for severe lowering of education potential51161
F13Screen for severe lowering of education potential; 10% may have severe heart defect; others have life expectancy reduced by 10 years (Down’s clinical description). Only affected identified72743
14As 13 above but the screening test identifies 60% of affected and 5% of unaffected pregnancies: no risk to unaffected141943
15Screen for Down’s clinical description: 1 unaffected fetus spontaneously aborted for every 2 affected fetuses diagnosed4766
16Screen for a Down’s clinical description: 2 unaffected fetuses spontaneously aborted for every 1 affected fetus diagnosed3173
G17A screening test similar to 15 above is in existence. Do extra lab test. Each extra case detected costs £5000101154
18As 17 above but the cost/extra case detected is £100 00061058
19Add directive counselling to screening programme111154