Table 6

Association between outcome, in terms of BCSS and DMFS, and histologic grade, as assessed by VM and LM

ParameterBCSSDMFI
VM gradingLM gradingVM gradingLM grading
HR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI)P value
Grade*1.9 (1.6 to 2.3)1×10–132.4 (2.0 to 3.0)1×10–131.8 (1.5 to 2.1)1×10–132.1 (1.8 to 2.5)1.x10−13
Tubules*2.8 (1.9 to 4)5.9×10–91.9 (1.5 to 2.4)9.58×10–92.6 (1.9 to 3.6)4.9×10–101.7 (1.4 to 2.1)4.6×10–8
Pleomorphism*1.8 (1.5 to 2.2)6.2×10−112.7 (2 to 3.7)1×10–101.6 (1.3 to 1.8)1.6×10–92.2 (1.7 to 2.9)6.1×10–10
Mitosis*1.5 (1.3 to 1.7)2.5×10–111.7 (1.5 to 1.9)1×10–131.4 (1.3 to 1.6)9.1×10–111.6 (1.4 to 1.8)1.0×10–13
Grade†1.9 (1.6 to 2.3)1×10–131.8 (1.5 to 2.1)1.0×10–13
Tubules†2.2 (1.6 to 2.9)1.32×10–82.1 (1.6 to 2.6)3.6×10–9
Pleomorphism†1.8 (1.5 to 2.2)3.9×10–101.6 (1.3 to 1.9)7.42×10–9
Mitosis†1.8 (1.5 to 2.2)2.7×10–101.4 (1.2 to 1.6)2.2×10–9
  • *VM grading first session (November 2016).

  • †VM grading second session (February 2017).

  • BCSS, breast cancer-specific survival; DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival; LM, light microscopy; VM, virtual microscopy.