Skip to main content
Log in

Is the grading of breast carcinomas affected by a delay in fixation?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of delay in fixation on the modified Bloom and Richardson grade of eight breast carcinomas was investigated. Topologically shuffled samples of each tumour were immersed in fixative at times of 0.5, 2, 4, 6, 18 and 24 h after surgical removal. The grade of each tumour was assessed at delays of 0.5 and 6 h. The tubule formation and nuclear pleomorphism components of the grade showed no change with a delay in fixation of 6 h. The number of mitotic figures declined by a mean of 53% over the same period and this resulted in a decrease in the histological grade of one of the tumours. The implications of these findings for the handling of breast specimens in a diagnostic histopathological laboratory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JA, Fischermann K, Hou-Jensen K, et al. (1981) Selection of high risk groups among prognostically favorable patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg 194:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Baak JPA (1990) Mitosis counting in tumours. Hum Pathol 21:684–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JR (1960) Principles of biological microtechnique. Methuen, London, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom HJG, Richardson WW (1957) Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 11:359–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough W (1950) Mitotic activity in the tissues of dead mice, and in tissues kept in physiological salt solutions. Exp Cell Res 1:410–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross SS, Start RD, Smith JHF (1990) Does delay in fixation affect the number of mitotic figures in processed tissues? J Clin Pathol 43:597–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Royal College of Pathologists Working Group (1990) Pathology reporting in breast cancer screening draft guidance.

  • Donhuijsen K (1986) Mitosis counts: reproducibility and significance in grading of malignancy. Hum Pathol 17:1122–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Donhuijsen K, Schmidt U, Hirche H, Beuningen D van, Budach V (1990) Changes in mitotic rate and cell cycle fractions caused by delayed fixation. Hum Pathol 21:709–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JL, Donalson JT (1964) The time of fixation and the mitotic index. Am J Clin Pathol 41:158–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis PSJ, Whitehead R (1981) Mitosis counting — a need for reappraisal. Hum Pathol 12:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston CW (1984) The assessment of histological differentiation in breast cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 54:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston CW (1987) Grading of invasive carcinoma of the breast. In: Page DL, Anderson TJ (eds) Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 303

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston CW, Gresham GA, Rao GS, Zebro T, Haybrittle JL, Houghton J, Kearney G (1982) The cancer research campaign (Kings/Cambridge) trial for early breast cancer — pathological aspects. Br J Cancer 45:655–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Graem N, Helweg-Larsen K (1979) Mitotic activity and delay in fixation of tumour tissue. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [A] 87:375–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybittle JL, Blarney RW, Elston CW, Jonhson J, Doyle PJ, Campbell FC, Nicholson RI, Griffiths K (1982) A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 45:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempson RL (1976) Mitosis counting. II. Hum Pathol 7:482–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann R, Elston CW, Hunter S, Ellis IO, Lowe J, Blarney RW (1985) Evaluation of mitotic activity as component of histological grade and its contribution to prognosis in primary breast carcinoma (abstract). J Pathol 146:271a

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar PB (1942) The rate of penetration of fixatives. J R Microsc Soc 61:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris HJ (1976) Mitosis counting. III. Hum Pathol 7:483–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Parl FF, Dupont WD (1982) A retrospective cohort study of histologic risk factors in breast cancer patients. Cancer 50:2410–2416

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn CM, Wright NA (1990) The clinical assessment of proliferation and growth in human tumours: evaluation of methods and applications as prognostic variables. J Pathol 160:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully RE (1976) Mitosis counting. I. Hum Pathol 7:481–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg SG (1976) Reproducibility of the mitosis count in the histologic diagnosis of smooth muscle tumours of the uterus. Hum Pathol 7:451–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd JH, Dowle C, Williams MR, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Hinton CP, Blarney RW, Haybrittle JL (1987) Conformation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 56:489–492

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Start, R.D., Flynn, M.S., Cross, S.S. et al. Is the grading of breast carcinomas affected by a delay in fixation?. Vichows Archiv A Pathol Anat 419, 475–477 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650675

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650675

Key words

Navigation