Summary
Echo-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic masses is a well-established diagnostic procedure. However, there is no consensus as to the superiority of cytology or microhistology.
We compared the results of cytology and microhistology in 50 consecutive patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy for pancreatic masses. Aspirates were positive for malignant disease in 42 patients; the other eight had chronic focal pancreatitis. In the 42 cases of cancer, cytology provided conclusive results in 40 (95.2%); sampling was inadequate in two. Microhistology proved accurate in 30 cases (71.4%); insufficient tissue was obtained in 12, giving a statistically significant difference in favor of cytology (P<0.01).
In the eight patients with benign disease both techniques ruled out malignancy; in five microhistology gave further indications confirming suspected chronic pancreatitis (fibrosis, lymphocyte and histiocyte-cell infiltrate). Our results show that cytology is the method of choice in diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma. Microhistology can be a useful adjunct in patients with suspected chronic pancreatitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Celle G, Savarino N, Biggi E, Manzi C, Ceppa P, Licio GR, Arcuri V (1986) Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis: a simple and safe procedure for cancer of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 10: 545–548
Chagnon S, Cochand-Priallet B, Jacquenod P, Vilgrain N, Blery M (1987) Intéret de la cytoponction associée à la micro-biopsie dans les masses solides du pancréas. J Radiol 68: 733–736
Cornud F, Vissuzaine C, Sibeit A, Lenoir S, Blangy S, Bocquet L, Benacerraf R (1985) Sensibilité de la ponction-biopsie à l'aiguille fine dans le diagnostic histologique des tumeurs malignes hépatiques et pancréatiques. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 9: 47–50
Frable WJ (1983) Thin-needle aspiration biopsy. In: Bennington JL (ed) Major problems in pathology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 222–232
Glenthøj A, Sehested M, Torp-Pedersen S (1990) Ultrasonically guided histological and cytological fine needle biopsies of the pancreas. Reliability and reproducibility of diagnoses. Gut 31: 930–933
Hajdu EO, Kumari-Subaya S, Phillips G (1986) Ultrasonically guided percutaneous aspiration biopsy of the pancreas. Semin Diag Pathol 3:166–175
Hancke S, Holm HH, Kock F (1985) Ultrasonically guided puncture of pancreatic mass lesions. In: Holm HH, Kristensens JK (eds) Interventional ultrasound, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 100–105
Kocjan G, Rode J, Lees WR (1989) Percutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas: advantages and pitfalls. J Clin Pathol 42: 341–347
Lees WR, Hall-Craggs MA, Manhire A (1985) Five years experience of fine needle aspiration biopsy: 454 consecutive cases. Clin Radiol 36:517–520
Mitchell ML, Bittner Ca, Wills JS, Parker FP (1988). Fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas. A retrospective study of 73 cases. Acta Cytol 32:447–451
Scott Gazelle G, Haaga JR (1989) Guided percutaneous biopsy of intraabdominal lesions. AJR 153: 929–935
Smith EH (1991) Complication of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Radiology 178: 253–258
Solmi L, Gandolfi L, Muratori R, Leo P, Bacchini P (1987) Echo-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 8: 744–748
Solmi L, Muratori R, Brambati M, Gandolfi L, (1989) Comparison between the 21-Gauge Urocut needle and the 21-Gauge Sure-cut needle in echo-guided percutaneous biopsy of neoplastic liver lesions. Surg Endosc 3: 38–41
Taavitsainen M, Koivuniemi A, Bondestam S, Kivisaari L, Tierala E (1987) Ultrasonically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in focal pancreatic lesions. Acta Radiol 28: 541–543
Torp-Pedersen S, Juul N, Vyberg M (1984) Histological sampling with a 23 gauge modified Menghini needle. Br J Radiol 57: 155–154
Tudway DC, Newman J, Chard MJ (1988) Ultrasound guided fine needle histological biopsies in the abdomen. Clin Radiol 39: 377–380
Vilgrain V, Anagnostopoulos C, Chagnon S, Bléry M (1987) Etude de 90 ponctions à l'aiguille fine à visée diagnostique de l'abdomen supérieur sous controle échographique. Apport de l'analyse cyto et histologique. J Radiol 68: 35–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solmi, L., Muratori, R., Bacchini, P. et al. Comparison between echo-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and microhistology in diagnosing pancreatic masses. Surg Endosc 6, 222–224 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498807
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498807